Thursday, October 04, 2007

It's still a race to the moon?

Cruising along on CNN.com, I came across an article that definitely diverts away from the expected norm of what the media feels we should be considering news today, and undeniably holds the news value of unusualness...

NASA chief: China will beat us back to the moon

The Chinese Space Program has announced a shuttle visit to the lunar rock in the year 2020 and "we" seem to be upset that another competition has been set into motion... and us without an invite...

I guess you could say this all started when Russia, (when under the Soviet Flag,) launched Sputnik on October 4, 1957. President Kennedy issued the challenge of getting a man on the moon to NASA in 1961 and Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin completed it with the Apollo mission in July 1969.

Now, all fingers point back to Bush's challenge back in 2004 and NASA's reply of 16 years later... it seems we are less enthusiastic this go around and China grabbed the chance once again to spark up space travel.

I'm not quite sure, but hadn't the U.S. given up "the rights" to the Moon and said anyone who lands there can have it? -This being said if anyone can own the moon.

So now China is trying to go ahead and learn more about the "man who lives there" and the U.S is furious that we didn't think to do the same sooner.

Questions if I may:

Would we have planned a sooner departure if China had not presented their intentions?

Why is it so important that the U.S be the first to go back to the moon if we didn't feel it "top priority" for the last 30 years?

Are we not busy enough with a war going on or is that old news due to its lengthy outstretch?

I say rock on China! Head to the moon and have a "blast!"

-Link to set article: China's the runner up and we're still angry.Link

celebrity sicksposé

Monday night I half-watched the Simpsons and Family Guy on my24. A lot of times I don't pay that much attention when I watch TV, especially if it's episodes I've seen before. Anyway, after these this show called Celebrity Exposé came on at 7PM. I don't know if any of you caught it ... but it was absolutely ridiculous.

This episode was all about Lindsay Lohan and her totally outta control lifestyle. The details involved were freakishly invasive. At first it chronicled her arrests for cocaine possession and stints in rehab. It showed paparazzi video of her IN the rehab facility, then let the viewer know exactly when she left, where she went, who she saw. At one point the show portrayed her as a serious danger to herself and others while driving under the influence, then turned around and talked about her privileged lifestyle in an admiring way. The show implied her parents might be to blame for some of her behavior followed by clips of them saying all adoring things about their daughter.

For a while I was hypnotized and disgusted at the same time by this show, but I started to realize it was going to be more than a half-hour investment of my time and quit watching. I felt kind of gross for watching as long as I did, and sad for Lindsay. Here's her most famous mugshot, for your viewing pleasure.

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

Radiohead's Big Idea


Radiohead’s latest album, “In Rainbows”, has been released, and it’s free … at least if you want it to be. The British band has decided to let the consumer choose how much he or she would like to pay. The album is only available for download through their website, where they also offer a deluxe package for around eighty US Dollars.
I came to like Radiohead in a somewhat unique way. I heard the string quartet tribute to "Ok Computer" before any of their original work. This, in part, is what interested me about the band. They had the ability to pervade musical genres. I have to respect how “rock n’ roll” this is of them to snub the major labels' method of money making, and empower their fans. Radiohead has completed their contract with EMI, and are now without label. Maybe Radiohead has discovered the solution to the ever prevalent problem of illegal music downloading. Most critics have agreed that this one of the most momentous developments since the creation of digital downloading, and that Radiohead is the right band at the right time to attempt such a stunt. However, that begs the question, is this just a publicity stunt? I choose to believe that the band really is fighting the good fight for rock music, all gimmicks aside. That said, rock on, Radiohead, rock on!

SNL is still sorta funny

I do not plan on making weekly YouTube links my blog focus, but the following was just too good to pass up. For a few years, a newcomer to Saturday Night Live has virtually revitalized the comedic output of the show. Andy Samberg has become famous for his SNL Digital Shorts. These short clips often incorporate celebrity guests including Justin Timberlake, Natalie Portman, and Peyton Manning into hilarious skits. Samberg’s most famous skits are “Lazy Sunday” and “Dick in a Box” featuring Justin Timberlake.

Samberg's newest digital short is a mock music video centered on Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the President of Iran. Ahmadinejad recently spoke at Columbia University in New York City and claimed there was not a "homosexual phenomenon" in Iran; women were treated as equals, and Iran had no association with insurgents in Iraq.

His controversial visit is referenced in this following clip. Samberg's Digital Shorts are a perfect example of traditional television shows reformatting their programming to cater to this new generation of post-modern electronic media consumers.


"Iran So Far"

Sex & the City Movie

Since Sex and the City went off the air there have been a lot of rumors about a movie coming out. For those of you that have been hiding under a rock and never saw the show, it's about four women living in New York City trying to find romance. The television show was absolutely hilarious and fun, which was probably why it was so successful. I believe there were a total of six seasons. The show ended in a way that kept the audience wanting more.

Finally, I've read in US Weekly that they are in the process of making the film. They even provided pictures of Sarah Jessica Parker's character, Carrie, in her wedding dress. Personally, I wouldn't wear a feather on my head to get married, but hey I'm sure Carrie would! I just hope that the movie is as good as the television show, because I'm sure the audience is going to have high expectations.

Tuesday, October 02, 2007

Dr. Burke's absence

The new season of Grey's Anatomy began last Thursday night without one of the most interesting and main characters, Dr. Burke. Actor Isaiah Washington who played the talented surgen was kicked off the show shortly after the end of last season because of his anti-gay comments concerning fellow gay actor T.R Knight. Washington had a pattern of bad behavior and apparently could not hold his tounge about his feelings of sexual orientation. It seemed apparent to me that this decision must have been in the works for some time considering the way the writters wrote him off the show. It seems too conveinent that Christina and Burke's relationship was so rocky right before then wedding and that he actually was the one to leave her at the alter. The writters than adjusted the issue quickly in the show by having McDreamy simple tell Christina that Burke had quit. There is talk that his mother will still be making appearances in the show so it will be interesting how they decided to write that portion back into the show. I believe it was in their best interest to write him off the show considering that Walt Disney is a co-owner of the show. It is too much of a liability for them to keep him on the show. It would look insenstive and in bad taste to keep Washington employed. Although i agree on the decision, I will miss is promince as Burke and the odd relationship that he and Christina held.

Irony

Originally, I went to Youtube to get a version of the FCC song from Family Guy. Anyone who is familiar with Family Guy knows that the creators of the show love to parody everything. Well, they made a little montage to a pretty clever song about the FCC and how it exercises constraint over media content.

I couldn't figure out why I was unable to view the video until I paused and read the print at the top of the page: "This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation"

So I decided to put a different version on- skip past the first 13 seconds if you'd like. You can listen to the original lyrics but they're set to different visuals. It's very fitting however that after we discuss copyright laws I come across something like this WHILE trying to provide an example of the FCC and its views.



While searching I also came across this video, which is to the same tune. However it jokes around about TV's content from a creative standpoint- or lack thereof. Pretty interesting! Another blatant way for Fox to advertise its own shows at the 2007 Emmys...

Back to Frasier and Everybody Loves Raymond, Please!

So for the last 2 weeks I have watched FOX's new show, Back To You, and I found it to be one of those shows that I am not the biggest fan of, but feel compelled to watch it. I know, it makes no sense.

I was a frequent view of Frasier and Everybody Loves Raymond a few years back, so I think tuning in to Back To You has something to do with the fact that Kelsey Grammer and Patricia Heaton are in it. I did not realize how typecast these two actors were until their new show debuted. They are both fabulous actors, but it is hard to see Grammer's character so, um, un-Frasier like. Heaton's character is different from Debra but there are some similarities. And I just realized now that I do not know either character's names on Back To You! My bad. See, I must have been so consumed with trying NOT to see these actors as their previous characters that I really know squat about the show itself.

Here's a little clip of Grammer's character ripping another reporter on air which prompted his being fired and moving back to the station where Heaton's character is.
Frasier, why are you so mean?

Monday, October 01, 2007

A little too far?

A friend recently sent me this video of a newscast from WTOC in Savannah, Georgia. The story is about a woman who is accused of throwing boric acid at her neighbor.

Take a look:


I find it interesting that this local station decided to air the story as it was edited. I think the factual elements of the story are newsworthy, but it's pretty evident that the reporter was more focused on the woman. I say this because the package didn't include any comment from the neighbor (although the reporter says the neighbor wasn't home), any reference to the effects of boric acid or even an interview with the police.

The fact that this TV station and this reporter ran this story makes me question their ethical integrity. Do local stations sometimes hype-up their stories to boost ratings? Of course. Is breaking news much more common? No doubt.

When I first saw this video, I found it funny. I still do. However, it never should have been broadcast on local tv.

Sunday, September 30, 2007

While this Harrison Ford parody trailer is not as seamless as the James Bond video we watched in class they both make a good point echoing one of the deciding factors in the 2 Live Crew case. 2 Live Crew was almost sued for using large parts of Roy Orbison’s Pretty Woman. One of the deciding factors in the case was that 2 Live Crew used Roy Orbison’s material to make something new.
In this Harrison Ford trailer the creators used a montage of different snippets from Ford’s numerous movies in which his wife and children are threatened. The creators are using past works to create something new and creative. They are not saying that they had anything to do with his movies. They are using Harrison Ford’s movies to use this relatively new technology of private, normal individuals creating media products that can be distributed to a global audience.
If copyright laws became so strict that people could not even sample past works technologies that put the power of the mass media in the hands of normal people would struggle to survive. This regulation would do nothing but to shut off an important source of creative possibilities. In the end, as long as artists are using past material to create something new and to further innovation I do not believe that these past works are being abused.
Here is the link for the video.

Friday, September 28, 2007

Arthur Fonzarelli

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket


A few days ago JSOnline posted a story about the group Visit Milwaukee raising money to put a statue of the Fonz from TV's "Happy Days" in downtown Milwaukee. They've already got $45,000 out of the total $85,000.

Interviewed for the article, Henry Winkler (the actor who portrayed Fonzie) thinks the statue is "bizarre" but he is also "so OK with it." He even said he'd come to town for the dedication ceremony. I don't know about you guys, but I won't be missing this for the world.

Viacom owns the rights to the Fonz's character, and they've said the project can go ahead. Some people in Milwaukee are less than pleased, believing television shows based here aren't what Milwaukee should be promoting. But I think it's pretty sweet. It'll be life-sized and probably bronze. I have my doubts about how much extra tourism this statue will actually bring to our city. It's a cool idea, though. Why should just famous figures in history have statues around town? Media is a part of our collective history, too.

I wonder what the statue will look like exactly. Do you think we'll be able to sit on it?

Offensive Advertising

Today on my way to work I tuned into Newsradio 620. Charlie Sykes was on, and he was talking about this story. An advertisement for Folsom Street Fair (a sexual fetish festival, as I understand it) in San Francisco depicts almost-nude men and women in bondage/leather outfits sitting around a table mimicking the Last Supper. Miller is a sponsor of the festival, and their logo is displayed on the bottom of the image. Many people are outraged by the image and The Catholic League is calling for a boycott of Miller products. When I was listening to the story on 620, people kept calling in and sharing their anger over it... many of them were really, really worked up about it.

Maybe it's just that I wasn't personally offended by this image, but my reaction was that these people were a little bit too worked up. There is media content everywhere we look that is bound to offend someone. I suppose I come across media messages pretty regularly that go against my personal opinions and beliefs, but I realize it happens, so take them with a grain of salt. It's not like Miller is sending people dressed in bondage to the houses of these people and having them perform a live re-enactment of the Last Supper in their living rooms. And it's not the first or the last time someone is going to mock other people's beliefs... it happens.

Or... maybe this image was TOO controversial. It didn't personally offend me, but it is pretty extreme. Maybe Miller should've recognized that and pulled out as a sponsor of the festival in avoidance of this situation and the resulting "bad press"?

What do you guys think? Do people care too much about offensive/controversial media content, or is it the responsibility of the media to refrain from using/sponsoring images or other content that could potentially upset people?

"Childrens do learn..."

One of my favorite shows on television right now is The Daily Show with Jon Stewart.  As a fan of current events, I find the satirical spin of various news stories hilarious.  Today, while doing some homework, I was shocked to overhear another ingenious quote by George Bush.  Addressing a group of young students at a school, Bush said the following:

"As yesterday's positive report card shows 'childrens' do learn when standards are high and results are measured."

Afterwards, Jon Stewart's comments were entertaining, as usual.  The clip was from today's episode of the Daily Show, so I was not able to find of clip including Jon Stewart. But, I found the video clip from Bush's speech.  I recommend trying to find video with Stewart's comments.

In lieu of the Daily Show's success, I have noticed other cable news networks creating similar shows that mock/critique current events.  Most notably, Fox News' Red Eye (which isn't funny, at all).

Although Bush's newest speech slip-up does not directly relate to much in our class, I figured many would find it very amusing.

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Legitimate mashers

Thinking about lecture yesterday, I realized there are a lot of legitimate mashers in our remix culture as well. Fatboy Slim, for example, is a legitimate remix artist who takes old forms of music and sort of "modernizes" them. For example, his song "Weapon of Choice" uses a sampling of Sly & the Family Stone's "Into My Own Thing."

But he doesn't just stop at sampling; Slim has also reinvented the song "Magic Carpet Ride" by Steppenwolf, under the alias of The Mighty Dub Katz. I remember listening to this song many years ago, and thinking, “Wow...what an interesting take on this song!”

Mashing isn't strictly an illegal practice; with the rights and permission of the original artists, it's a legitimate art form.

Here’s Fatboy Slim’s “Weapon of Choice,” starring Christopher Walken in the music video. Classic.

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Copyright thoughts

The talk about copyright today made me think a lot about whether or not I more in support of copyright reform or more in support of strict copyright laws.

This video that I have posted highlights the instance where Avril Lavigne rips off The Rubinoos "I Want to Be Your Boyfriend" refrain in her song "Girlfriend." The Rubinoos song has been one of my favorite songs for many, many years. I truly believe that it is one of the best power pop songs ever written, and the song has come to mean a lot to me over the years. When I first heard Avril's song, I got angry. Really angry. How could some pop tart come along and piss all over one of my favorite creative works? It seemed so wrong to me. The copyright laws protecting this kind of artistic infringement represent an important concept in respecting the original artists creative talent and integrity. I was ecstatic when I read in the paper that legal action was being pursued against Avril.

Perhaps there are two branches of copyright control. One branch encompasses distribution issues such as "piracy," copying, selling for profit, etc. The other sphere deals with the degradation of an existing creative work, where an artist attempts to make money off of a previous creative effort. This is the point where I think copyright laws are not only crucial, but make sense.

metalocalypse

If any of you have watched Metalocalypse on Cartoon Network before you might be interested to know that they released their very first album today. Metalocalypse is a cartoon about an extremely popular death metal band and has its own original comical songs in it. I think it's pretty interesting that the TV show spawned it's own album. With songs like murmaider (a song about mermaid murder) and Briefcase full of guts I have to say its a pretty sweet album. You can listen to it here.

And thinking back on lecture today with the videos we were watching, it made me remember my favorite trailer that was altered. It's the pg version of the movie 300. This is perfectly safe for the kids to watch. Check it out here

Spencer Pratt

If any of you haven't caught an episode of The Hills on MTV, you may not know who Spencer Pratt is. He's Heidi's boyfriend, who is main character Lauren's ex- best friend. The feud between Spencer and Heidi and Lauren and her crew began during the last season of The Hills when Heidi continually chose her boyfriend over her friends.



Anyway, Spencer Pratt is quite the character. There have been rumors that he is desperate for fame, and will do anything to get it (including asking Heidi to marry him?). I was looking at US Weekly's website where it tells Spencer's back story and talks about all the rumors going around about him. What I found hilarious is that he actually has his own website that he created just for people to "hate on him". He actually asks people to. You can log on and view video from episodes, and comment on them. So, if you hate Spencer, here's your chance to tell him!

Amazon's new store

Check out the new service from from Amazon: AmazonMP3. It boasts of selling "play anywhere, DRM-free music downloads." If I were Apple I would worry, since the MP3 files Amazon is selling will work with iTunes and iPods. Amazon doesn't (yet) have music from every major label available (some haven't yet made peace with selling DRM-free) but they do have better prices than iTunes for many tracks (89 cents). And unlike iTunes downloads, you can do whatever you want with Amazon MP3s, like burn them onto CDs. So the copyright issues we discussed today aren't just a matter of how the government regulates media; they also figure into how the industry positions its products for sale. The music industry realizes that its customers want to copy their music, and one way it can survive its current crisis is by working with rather than against that fact. Preserving copyright in a strict sense might cost them too much business.

Remix Culture

Talking in class today about the Remix Culture, I thought of an old YouTube Video that made me laugh called "The Juggernaut." Forewarning, it is vulgar and contains extensive profanity.
The Juggernaut
It's based on a Marvel comic. I remember seeing it maybe two years ago, so it has been available to the public for at least that amount of time, without apparent concern to copyright law. I'm actually surprised that the content is allowed on sites like YouTube, owing to the profanity and the use of the Marvel imagery.
Doing a bit of background research on the video, I leaned that the style mimics a genre of film called Blaxploitation. Blaxploitation is a genre that emerged in 1970's (e.g. Shaft.) These films are mostly set in the ghetto and use humor to parody the lives of drug dealers, hit men, and pimps. It is a form that is widely criticized for it's extensive use of stereotypes.
Stereotypes aside, I found the video humorous in the way it puts an over-the-top adult spin on a children's comic. It's a good example of sampling and the remix culture that digs up a forgotten-to-most genre.
Maybe you'll find it funny, or maybe you'll find it offensive, hopefully you find it interesting and applicable to the class.
As I am sure most of you know, we are in the midst of premiere week on all the networks...therefore I am bringing up one of ABC's tactics for jogging viewer's memories cause they have been using this a lot. Instead of just showing the season finale from May the week before a show premieres, ABC has been showing recap shows. Last week there was one with a mix of Grey's Anatomy and Private Practice...I think it was primarily done to promote Private Practice rather than be a recap show, but whatever. Then this past Sunday there was a recap show for Desperate Housewives and a "Family Album" for Brother's and Sisters.

I think it is good that they do this because for some of us, myself included, it is hard to remember what the hell happened last May cause there is so much going on in these shows! Plus, the recaps can potentially grab a new audience by recaping nearly the entire series. I haven't noticed any other networks copying this, but then again, I haven't looked much since most of the shows I watch are on ABC now...

Monday, September 24, 2007

JOIN THE CLUB-EVERYBODY's DOIN' IT!

Hey --- if you didn't make it last Tuesday you cannot join the club.

JUST KIDDING! In fact there are many many more events on the way! The year is just beginning- so join the club today!

Advertising is a world of competition- get "differentiated" - it's painless!

E-mail uwmadclub-officers@uwm.edu for more info or to pay dues.



Next guest speaker : OCTOBER 17th, 2007. Bethany Rucinski form Zizzo Group Advertising.

Sunday, September 23, 2007

When Bad Things Hit Home...And Your Heart

I will most likely post videos for every blog and I went back and forth in my head as to whether or not I should post this video. So, I decided to let all of you in on something personal to me. My best friend Sarah Stachula died this summer in a rollover crash on I-794 off Pennsylvania Avenue in Cudahy. The crash occured May 27 around 2:30a.m. Channel 4 had the biggest coverage of this accident and also had a camera man filming from inside his vehicle at the site shortly thereafter. It is a somewhat lengthy raw video that pans back and forth and zooms in and out several times. It is not what I would call graphic but they do film her body bag, which will never be erased from my memory. I said to myself that I would NEVER watch this but weeks later, I decided to. My purpose for posting this video is to ask all of you what you think. Though we all know the media takes whatever means necessary to do their job I found this video to be a complete invasion of privacy for Sarah's family and friends. For many of my friends that watched it, we all asked eachother, "Where is the respect?" I realized just how invading and unsympathetic the media can be in even the most tragic cases. I understand I may have a biased opinion since I had never really felt that way before but until something like this could hit so close to home, I now have mixed feelings. I have no intention of bringing a depressing, somber mood to these blogs or the class but I would like to continue to post the remaining media coverage in future blogs. Be patient. Watch the vid. Comment back. Thanks!
-Elyse
If there is one demographic that is greatly underrepresented in the arena of political protest it would be the grandmothers of the nation. When people think of grandmothers they often envision grey- haired women knitting scarves and baking apple pies, but there is a new connotation to be taken into account: Political activist.
On September 15, 2007 a protest was held outside of Hilary Clinton’s office, I believe. The grandmother featured in the video is the leader of a group of American grandmothers protesting the war in Iraq. One of the women in the group was even arrested while protesting at another Senator’s office.
When I began watching this older woman’s speech I wanted to laugh because I got this vision in my head of old women being arrested as they chained themselves to pay phones or something. Luckily it did not take long for me to realize that the younger generation may be the leaders of the future, but it is the older generations that are the teachers. We would not have leaders without teachers. The woman speaking was passionate and realistic and you just wanted to believe her because she looked like a sweet little old lady. The truth is that she had a great message and delivered it well. Here is the video.

Friday, September 21, 2007

What Year is it Again?

Deja vu all over again. At least that seems to be the case if you've watched the news lately. Is it 2007, or 1994?

O.J. is back in the 24 hour news foreground after alledgedly attempting to steal back some of his memorabilia at gunpoint.

Meanwhile, Hillary's pushing her soon-to-be-irrelevant national healthcare plan again. I think I've seen this before.

This time around, Bill is the potential first gentleman, and O.J. isn't charged for murder.

But, the headlines and aura are essentially the same.

The 24 hour news stations are again clamoring almost non-stop over both stories. It is ironic, though that, again, much of the nation is looking to a Clinton to "restore" the White House, and take it back from a Bush. Simultaneously, the 24 hour news networks arguably haven't had as juicy a celebrity story since the debate over the infamous Glove.

I guess the more things change, the more they stay the same.

Another technical foul...but for golf?

Every year my parents host a Badger weekend with all of their friends, and the main attraction is not for the game. Prior to and following after are the late nights out of drinking Long Islands, Swamp Waters, and Spotted Cows, along with dancing to decades of great music and hopefully witnessing my dad getting slapped in the face for the second year in a row. Naturally, I was pumped to attend!

All in all the game against The Citadels was surprisingly exciting with an end score of 31 to 21, Wisconsin. The rest of the weekend proceeded with lots of laughs and good times.

Sunday morning, September 16, as we were slowly delaying our departure time, my Mom and I were reading the Wisconsin State Journal, which was generously provided by the hotel free of charge, and my father was watching the pre-television talk to the Brewer's and Packer's games.

Suddenly, I come across a little article on the bottom of the Sports section titled: Steinhauer, Americans choking? Being the daughter of a quite good player of golf, I realized that Sherri Steinhauer is a Madison resident who is/was participating in the Solheim cup in Sweden. I read on.

Turns out that once again journalistic views emphasis what people shouldn't say on television and they "accidentally" do.... Sounds like a case of missed censorship?

Golf analyst Dottie Pepper, who was once part of the American team, seemed quite upset after her former teammates let slip a three point lead with only three holes left to play. After Steinhauer had missed a possible victory putt, Pepper, thinking the network had gone off the air, said "Chokin' freakin' dogs."

I found this situation very funny, but what else was amusing was, most of the article did not reflect on the competition as a whole. The only real emphasis was on what Pepper had said on networked television that should have been censored. This is a classic case about how media feels everyone loves a goof-up. Frankly, it's true.

Thursday, September 20, 2007

What do Britney Spears and Bill Belichick have in common?

As many of you may have seen, the following video was posted on YouTube recently, featuring a guy with bleached hair and eyeliner crying and defending Britney Spears after her recent VMA performance/disaster...



Anyways... New England Patriots head coach, Bill Belichick, is currently under fire after a Patriots video assistant was caught by NFL security filming the New York Jets' defensive signals. The following video was posted to YouTube shortly thereafter...:



It's kind of interesting how a "regular" person can create a piece of viral media and become famous instantly (the Britney guy is apparently trying to get his own reality show now....) ... And it's even more interesting that they can become so popular that other people can impersonate them in attempt to ride their coat tails to fame... and a lot of times it works. I guess in the age of YouTube, it's not that hard.

Bond's 756th home run ball

Mark Ecko, owner of the Ecko line of clothing, purchased Barry Bond's historic home run ball and is letting fans decide what should become of the ball on his website.  
Fans can decide whether to:
a. Give the ball to the Cooperstown Hall of Fame
b. Brand the ball with an asterisk and give the ball to the Hall of Fame
or
c. Send the ball into space via a rocket

Over five million votes have been counted at this time, and that number is climbing rapidly.  I voted to send the ball into space, and you should too.  On a business note, it is a brilliant attention grabbing move.  He bought the ball for something like $750,000.  He is selling himself and his ventures in a move that is fun and make people feel good.  Three quarters of a million dollars is a rediculous amount of money for a baseball, but I enjoyed the opportunity to decide the ball's fate, and look forward to further dumb publicity stunts.

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Student Tasered at Kerry Event

Here is a video I found on a student tasered by police at a John Kerry Q&A at the University of Florida. The student asked Kerry questions, but surpassed his allotted time to speak and was escorted to the exit by police. However, the student still wanted to ask Kerry some other questions, and he tried to force his way through the police, thus getting tasered. In my opinion, he should have calmed down and not tried to not get too aggressive with the police. Also, I don't know if this was done on purpose (to provoke the police), or if this was standard police procedure. They could have just taken him outside and warned him not to come back. I do know is that this situation is being seen by some as a negative act by the Florida Police Department, and they are spinning the coverage as being "brutal." Any other viewpoints are appreciated. And now, the video:

Monday, September 17, 2007

Iranian Miniseries

Hey everyone! This afternoon I was paging through the Journal-Setinel and I came across an article in the NATION/WORLD segment. It was a rather good size write up about a new miniseries airing in Iran.

The show is called "Zero Degree Turn" and is strikingly similar to "Schindler's List." It tells the story of an Iranian diplomat stationed in Paris during WW2. He becomes sympathetic to the Jews' plight and rescues hundreds by giving out Iranian passports. The show is really getting people talking both in Tehran, Iran, Europe and here in North America.

There are several amazing facets to this new show. First of all, it was required to be condoned by Iran's clerical leadership in order to be aired. Since most broadcasting is done by the government, (including this miniseries), which is run by a President who has publicly questioned whether the Holocaust ever took place, this subject matter is touchy to say the least. It is impressive that a show clearly sympathetic toward the Jews and their misfortunes was allowed to run. Normally the Holocaust is RARELY mentioned by state media in Iran and hardly at all taught in public schools. Iranians have very little information about it.

Here is a website to learn more.

Normally in all media produced by the state, women are required by a state-mandated Islamic dress code to wear burkas. For the first time actresses are appearing free from this unrealistic costume. (Since the show is set in WW2 Paris the producers definitely wanted their characters to reflect 1940s dress and style).

Many Iranians are learning about the atrocities of the Holocaust that had been unmentioned or denied for decades. The show has a very popular following in Iran and with 8 episodes left, has already started working on syndication within the US and Britain.

I'm wondering WHY, suddenly, Iran, (and thus it's Islamic leadership) is allowing such changes and programming to be aired? Perhaps they're trying to embrace the 25,000 Jews currently living within the borders? Or maybe the country is trying to appear less Anti-Semitic? It is certainly a first and hopefully not a last for this ultra-censored government run media industry.

Media Withdrawl

Since moving out of my parent's comfortable suburban home and living in 3 different apartments in just as many years, I have dealt with my limited budget in many different ways. I borrow clothes, I borrow books or buy used, I eat cheaply, and I don't pay for anything I don't have to- much like any other modern day student.

However, this skint existence translates to a lack of media choices in my life.

I can't afford cable, much less satellite, digital cable, TiVo, or DVR. I don't subscribe to XM radio, I don't have HD radio, and my boom box from 1999 just broke. I didn't have internet in either of my places of residence for two years. I mooched off of family and friends- "Oh, do you mind if I check my email?" I didn't even have a TV antennae for the first couple months I lived at my second to last place. Just fuzz and whatever movies I had received Christmases past (and my Golden Girls boxed set).

So imagine my delight when I finally got a new job and the ability to order cable internet in my new apartment. Leaping all over the apartment like a rabbit on 'roids, I called Time Warner Cable to set it all up- only to find that it will take two weeks for them to finally get over to my place and install it. The world became a bleak and antennae driven place once again.

My media consumption is curtailed. But it's the lack of my residential grandeur that really makes me aware of what I'm missing. So when I'm adjusting my rabbit ears to settle for network TV and you're enjoying Sports Center- think of me in my barren, cable-less, internet-less existence and appreciate what you have. These days, you have to pay more than ever for the good stuff.

Sunday, September 16, 2007

Sports Announcing

Most people tend to think that the media has some kind of ideological bias toward a liberal or conservative view . W. Lance Bennett approaches the debate of the media’s bias in a different way. Bennet writes in News: The Politics of Illusion that the media actually has a bias toward personalizing and fragmenting news stories. Basically he is saying that the news talks about specific events rather than the whole social problem causing the event. Readers get lost and events are dramatized.
I was watching the Packer game today when I realized that sports announcers actually try to connect the play by play events of the game to past league records and team trends. These announcers show the overall trend and story rather than a more fragmented approach. At one point, while discussing the defensive problems of the New York Giants, the announcer pointed out that many people covered up the flaws of the Giants by discussing Eli Manning’s personal growth. The announcer was acknowledging that the public personalized the story of the New York Giants by talking specifically about Eli Manning as if he were the entire team. After Brett Favre reached achieved yet another record the announcers discussed the development of Favre’s career and the Packer franchise.
While sports announcing may not be the same as covering hard news it covers the sport on a very fragmented basis: game by game. If these announcers are able to find a way to tie the present with the past so that fans can understand the development of the team, why can’t reporters find a way to connect the story of a homeless family in Milwaukee to the greater social problem of homelessness in the United States?

The Cupid Schuffle




There is apparently a new dance craze called the Cupid Schuffle. A dance ruteen choreographed for the Cupid Schuffle song. After viewing this halarious one eyed grandmother doing the ruteen i felt as though i have been living under a rock for not knowing of this craze earlier. How can an 82 year old woman have this down pat and i havent even heard about the dance at all. The show Family Guy also did a spoof of the dance in one episode. There is even an instuctional video out for those who would like to learn the exact steps. This granny's got some killer pointing action going on. It makes me wonder if that had something to do with the eye patch. i feel that is now my duty to learn this dance so i can live up to the one eyed granny.

Saturday, September 15, 2007

serj tankian

I was messing around on the Internet channel of my Wii this morning and found this new single by Serj Tankian on Youtube. He's 1/4 of the band System of a Down, but they're currently on hiatus for a few years so some members can pursue solo projects. Here's the video:



The bright colors and dark themes create an interesting juxtaposition. Also, the fact that the single is put on Youtube by Warner Bros. Records strikes me as amusing. You can buy the single at iTunes, it says too.

System of a Down's music has generally been politically themed, and this song is even more so. I pretty much like the song, it sounds like a lot of SOAD's music. The song and video's themes are very timely and definitely anti-war. He shows rather dramatically how the beliefs and ideals America is currently upholding/promoting affect everyone. But I don't feel like he's disrespecting the troops necessarily, just the decision to continue occupying Iraq. Or whatever we're doing now.

The discontent about the war continues to grow, and I think it's beneficial to have texts like this criticizing it. I wonder how relevant this will seem in a decade?

Friday, September 14, 2007

Celebrity news

So I work at a pharmacy, boring typical college job. Most of the time im pretty busy, but on occasion I get stuck behind the counter dealing with customers. I started to notice that A LOT of people buy celebrity news magazines. Personally before I started working there I would see them in line at the grocery store and would be aggravated that anyone would take time out of their lives to read about the lives of someone they will most likely never come in contact with. Not only will they never come in contact with these celebrity's but the chances of them actually interacting is even less! So as I see more and more people actually spending four of their hard earned dollars to read about this shit and I get curious. I pick on up one day while I was bored and I was completely correct, it's nothing but a bunch of shit. What clothes are popular, who was dressed like a slut(big surprise), what are the new trends. If you want to know what the trends are buy one of the many womens magazines and then you wont have to deal with all the celebrity gossip. Overall I think that it's a huge waste of time and money.

Too Funny or Too Foul??

Many advertisements these days are becoming more and more provocative. I am sure all of you have seen sex being used to sell products whether it is for a vehicle, fast food, shoes, etc. Is media going too far with this?

I recently have been hearing and viewing many newscasts and people talk about the new clearasil commercials. Clearasil's new slogan is "Clearasil may cause confidence". The clearasil company is using this slogan to promote their product in such a way that is making many people offended. I find these advertisements to be rather funny but it still is quite surprising to me how far Clearasil pushes it.

Here is a video I found on CNN discussing the controversy it is causing and the reactions from people. The video is almost 6 minutes long and shows a couple of the commercials. What do you think? Is this becoming a prevalent problem? Do you find these ads to be offensive?

Thursday, September 13, 2007

Narrative

Every Sunday night is kind of a special time for me. I toss aside my homework to watch Fox's cartoon sitcom lineup. Last Sunday night, I sat down as usual and watched two back-to-back episodes of the Simpsons followed by two Family Guy episodes.

What makes these shows appealing to just about everybody? I began thinking about this as I watched a show like the Simpsons that I had ingested since I was 10 years old. The Simpsons especially has managed to appeal to virtually every demographic that I can think of, and even made an impression on me before I could underestand a majority of the humor and pop culture references. Usually, I can't get enough of the episodes. Why?

The narrative.

The driving force of American time-based media. Cartoon sitcoms are developed around narratives that are accented with the social commentary style humor that defines the niche. However, as I watched the two cartoons on Sunday night, I was bored. Bored with the plot, with the humor, with the show. I couldn't even finish Family Guy. I was trying to figure out why I couldn't enjoy two of my favorite shows, and it really made me think about the crucial importance of a strong narrative line balanced against witty dialogue.

What makes a strong narrative? Where is that balance point? Why are some episodes more interesting than others, even with shows that have an amazing track record of quality entertainment?

These questions have been on my mind the entire past week. I'm looking forward to the new television season this fall to see how these thoughts will influence my opinions of new episodes.

Online Radio

This morning, I woke up rather early (6:30ish for me). There was no reason, I just did. Anyway, I decided to do something I hadn't done in a long while: listen to a talk radio station that broadcasts in Madison.

Because there isn't really a radio station that caters to my political beliefs in the Milwaukee area, I had to live stream on the internet for the Mic 92.1 in Madison (part of Air America radio).

I thought this was interesting because, just a few years ago, radio stations weren't allowed to broadcast over the web. Eventually, this ban came down, and now almost every radio station has a website from which you can listen to online.

This is a combination of two media: the internet and radio. There was also advertising on the player, which made it even more economically viable for the radio station to produce (since they already have advertisers on their stream).

P.S. We also turn down the TV volume for Packers' games ;)

Uber Delay

So this weekend I was watching the Packer game like the good Wisconsinite that I am, and was having an enjoyable time seeing Brett and the gang beat Philly. Following in the tradition of my parents, before actually sitting down to watch the game I turn the volume on the TV all the way down and put on WTMJ radio. My folks have done this since the days of announcer Jim Erwin because the FOX announcers are just, je ne sais pas...they lack a certain something.

When I finally sit down to watch the game, I notice that the delay between what is happening on TV and what is being said on the radio is terrible! There was an instance in which a play was completed on TV and the announcing of that particular play had not even begun yet on the radio. Or another instance when a play was completed on TV and they had already gone to a commercial break when the radio play-by-play was just finishing up.

It was all very frustrating. Can assume that this uber delay is still from the Janet Jackson incident a few years back? I think it is all very ridiculous, but there is probably not a whole lot I can do about it...hmm, do I deal with the delay or suck it up and listen to FOX announcers? I'll be delayed.

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

I just found this article on CNN.com. It talks about how Michael Vick's dogfighting ordeal became the center of attention in the media, earning non-stop news coverage for weeks. The public responded in outrage, demanding he be locked away for a long time. The article then points out that stories about human beings being tortured/raped/killed come and go from the news quickly, and they're barely a topic of conversation in society. This might be because for some reason people are more sensitive about dogs being hurt than people being hurt... but probably because Michael Vick is a celebrity.

This reminded me a lot of what we talked about in class yesterday... how news channels are straying from news of actual importance, in favor of news that will attract the most viewers. Not that the Michael Vick case isn't a big deal - at least it's actually real news, and not another "breaking news" story about where Paris Hilton ate lunch today - but there are plenty of stories everyday that deserve at least as much attention as this does, but they don't because the people involved aren't celebrities.

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Rumors

I've heard some rumors around campus that the Leader, one of the campus newspapers here, is having some difficulty staying afloat- both financially and organizationally. They're only rumors, so if the Leader comes out with a paper tomorrow, well then I guess I'm wrong.

But, if the rumors are true, I sincerely hope that the Leader can continue to publish, even though I'm a member of the UWM Post.

Having multiple papers induces a sense of competition...something that the broadcast or online campus media outlets don't quite offer. (Ironically, as we lighlty discussed media ownership today, it came to me that competition among local newspapers is quickly fading as more and more newspapers that operate in the same market are either merging into one paper or being owned by the same company..."UWM Post-Leader?"...I hope not.)

This campus is seeing a surge in population, in recognition and even in financial contributions. Hopefully, we won't be seeing a decrease in campus media.

Comcast Leave Britney Alone!

1. Because the topic of cable companies with no competition came up in today's class, here's some ranting against the cable company Comcast by a critic for Advertising Age, Bob Garfield. Maybe you have experienced similar exasperation because of Time Warner. I read about this at the blog BuzzMachine, where the author, Jeff Jarvis, describes the negative consequences of monopolies and duopolies, i.e., companies that have no competition. He has some intriguing suggestions about what can be done about this, including the idea of groups of ordinary customers creating their own advertising campaigns against companies that screw them over to take back some power and publicize the practices that they dislike. I'll leave it at that and you can click over if you're interested.

2. Anyone have any thoughts about this video, which is nearing a million views on YouTube after only a single day? I'll tell you what I think: this guy seems sincere and I admire his courage to share his feelings with the whole world. A lot of the comments at YouTube are really nasty and abusive, which is typical. Perhaps we'll return to this example in a few weeks when we talk about media audiences and fandom.

Monday, September 10, 2007

The Golden Girls- Boxed set vs. Cable Viewing

This week I've been ingesting quite a bit of media, but the source that really sticks out in my mind is the Golden Girls. I'm an avid fan; I own seasons one through four and currently I've been popping in season 3. In case any of you don't remember Golden Girls... check out the show's them below.



Owning boxed sets really helps me out now, because I no longer have cable. Lifetime network carried Golden Girls for a solid 2 hours per day, but obviously with conventional rabbit ears, I'm stuck with Cosby reruns and Sesame Street. However- in my opinion, owning the seasons is a much more preferable way to get my fix.

I can choose which episodes I want to watch (I recommend 'The Audit' from Season 3 or 'The Competition' from Season 1), I don't have to deal with commercials (now that the 'Tiny House' commercial is no longer running, advertising has lost its appeal for me), and I don't have to watch Lifetime's advertisements for its made-for-TV-movies.

Invest in your favorite sitcom's boxed set. Your viewing pleasure will triple! And if your favorite sitcom happens to include Dorothy, Sophia, Blanche, and Rose- I approve wholeheartedly.

Sunday, September 09, 2007

Ubiquitous

Dictionary says:

Ubiquitous |yoōˈbikwətəs| adjective: present, appearing, or found everywhere.

I must write a post because it suddenly struck me: We as a people are truly inundated by technology and thus: media. It is impossible to make it from morning to night without directly or indirectly sending or receiving some sort of communication.

I look around my flat and notice both my roommates on their laptops. As am I. I see one adjust his ipod ear buds. The other finishes an animated film on DVD while I receive a text message from my brother. Moments later I'm walking our dog down the block and cannot help but see several billboards, bus shelter ads, and even moving advertisements on cars. (Jimmy Johns, Pizza Hut, Geek Squad). Passing a business with talk radio blaring, I return to our flat just in time to watch the local news. Followed by The Jon Stewart Show. As evening grows later and later I relax reading the latest issue of Bicycling Magazine. I wonder at the same time what life would be like if radio waves were never discovered or if I'd read quite so much if the movable printing press had never been invented.

To be totally unplugged is rare. It requires for some a big sacrifice. Try not turning on your cell phone as well as not going online for a day. Hard to get by, eh?

Cavemen

The ever so popular and halarious caveman commercials by GEICO.com have become so infamous that ABC has decided to dedicate a sitcom series based on their lives. The series is set to begin this October 2nd at 7:00 pm. Follow the three cavemen characters though their lives as they have recently moved to San Diego as they face prejudice views considering them ignorant and unsocialized. The irony is that the characters personality styles are quite the opposite which makes for a good laugh.

Friday, September 07, 2007

Deadspin.com

One of the websites I read semi-regularly is http://www.deadspin.com/. It's a blog updated multiple times throughout the day that reports the latest updates in the world of sports, with a humorous spin. My boyfriend is a huge sports fan and forced me to read it one day, but what got me hooked is how funny the content is. You need to have at least a small amount of knowledge about sports to get a lot of the jokes (I'd say I know a fair amount for a girl, but not to any impressive extent), but if you get even some of them, it's quite entertaining.

Anyways, one thing I've noticed about this blog is that it has developed into a sort of online community. The readers, like with most blogs, have the ability to leave comments (and a lot of times the comments are even funnier than the posts themselves). I don't leave comments myself, but what I've noticed, after reading the site regularly for a long time, is that many of the same people comment every single day. They all use screen names, but many of them refer to one another by their real names, and even remember personal things about each other... they've become friends in a way. For example, after the I-35 bridge collapsed in Minnesota, there was a post about how the Twins had to cancel one of their games. In this post, many commentors were making posts calling out for other commentors, who they knew lived in or near Minneapolis, to post something so everyone knew they were okay. I thought that was neat, that even though their relationship exists solely in the comments section of a blog, they have come to care about one another.

Thursday, September 06, 2007

YouTube's Finest

I recently moved out and have yet to get cable. Trust me, I'm dying without it but YouTube has semi saved my life and has fed my addiction to visual entertainment. If your humor is anything closely related to mine, you'll find this video to be hilarious...drunk or sober! To make a long story short I heard about this video while playing sand volleyball this summer at Root River in Franklin. It just goes to show the impact word of mouth has among a large group of people. YouTube has clearly gained popularity as a form of Internet entertainment and this video has been viewed over 859,000 times and commented on over 3,300 times since its post on February 12, 2007. After watching this video several times on my own and also with friends, we’re now the cool kids who quote almost every line and post them to eachother’s Facebook accounts.

Here is the vid

Commercialization of Video Games

Commercialization is defined as, “to offer for sale; make available as a commodity” (Dictionary.com). So, through this definition, one question comes to mind: How do the media sell video games? By utilizing appealing images and streaming video, the video game industry attempts to sell a vision to the masses, but unlike television and movies, games have a system of control. A player can interact with several things within a game world, and it’s this aspect of controlling a player in a new setting that can grab a person’s attention. For example, the Nintendo Wii offers a totally different system of control that is seen as “revolutionary.” Sure, there have been other motion-sensing devices used in the past (i.e. Sony’s Eyetoy), but the games that the Wii has offer a sense of freedom of movement that no other system has offered before. When I first saw images and video of Nintendo’s new console in action, I wanted to play with a greater aspect of control. I saw other people playing and smiling and having fun, so why couldn’t I do the same? I wanted to be a part of the bandwagon. And, I believe, this is how the system caught on fire all across the globe. It is these images that shape our understanding of games and, in some cases, function as a proponent for us to buy these products; to explore a world that can be much different from our own. It is this concept that started my years as a video gamer, since my mother first gave me a Nintendo Entertainment System. And I’ve been hooked by several ideas and concepts of video games ever since. The power of images fuel our imagination and take us to places that we’ve never seen before, and it’s this power that contributes to the commercialization of video games and their entertainment.

First Post

Here is a video I found. It's the credit sequence from Mad Men, a new show on AMC that I really like. The credits are in the style of animations by Saul Bass, who made dozens of great title sequences beginning in the 1950s.



And here is a picture I found on the front page of the NY Times website. This is a philanthropist named Eli Broad.



Happy blogging.

Tuesday, September 04, 2007

This is the course blog for JMC262, Principles of Media Studies. It is used as a community media diary for the students and instructor of the course to discuss their experiences of media. If you are taking this course in Fall 2007, your posts will appear in this space. Until then, have a nice summer.

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Wikipedia

Today in my Communication class my TA discussed our papers that she returned and some people were very angry about their grades. She continued to discuss why people received bad grades and then went on a tangent about how to never use Wikipedia as a source and that its completely in accurate and useless. It made me angry and upset becuase for the past weeks we have been talking about how great and fastinating that everyday people are having a change to create media and contribute to things like Wikipedia. I wanted to lash out at her and tell her she was stupid for dismissing something that has the potential to be so great, so quickly. I also should have told her to talk visit my JMC 262 class and partiipate in our discussion about Wikipedia. Wikipedia has opened a whole new door of information on everything you can imagine. Yes it had its downfalls but I would say our traditional encyclopedia has numerous negative attributes as well. At least wikipedia has the potential to fix its mistakes immediately. So does my TA just believe the average person is not educated enough to supply information or maybe I should just explain to her how this is revolutionalizing information on the internet

Monday, May 14, 2007

The Last One

For my last blog entry, I'd like to reflect a little on how far we've come (or not). This was mainly caused by a book I'm in the process of reading by Hunter S. Thompson called "Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail '72." What a great journalist, what a great book. One part of the book just made me laugh, because otherwise I think I might have cried. Seems like some people never really learn. We got into a mess like Vietnam, and you think that we would have learned from that. Instead, we got ourselves into an even bigger mess like Iraq thirty years later. Here's a quote from the book: "The front page of the Washington Post carried...McCarthy's harsh warning that he was going to hold Muskie '"accountable"' for his hawkish stance on the war in Vietnam prior to 1968...Muskie seemed genuinely shaken by this attack. He immediately called a press conference to admit that he'd been wrong about Vietnam in the past, but now '"I've had reason to change my mind."' His new position was an awkward one to explain, but after admitting his '"past mistakes"' he said that he now favored '"as close to an immediate withdrawl from Vietnam as possible."' Ha, ha. Flash forward a few years, change a few names, and it's the same story. I almost typed Iraq in place of Vietnam every time. I like to stay optimistic and believe that we're slowly moving forward, but when I read crap like this I admit it's hard, especially when Bush makes Nixon look like a good President. Yet I still believe that as long as we have people who are willing to keep an eye on Big Brother and do good things in general, we can still inch forward. Here's to the future of journalism and thanks for a great class with a great instructor!!!

thanks for the class

Just wanted to thank Michael Newman for a great class.

so heres my last blog...its all about the greatest thing on Earth!

and it makes me totally lame

I Michael Wisth am seriously addicted to Maroon 5. Its all I got. I really suggest everyone check out the new song and the new album. check this review


Maroon 5's 2002 debut album, Songs About Jane, was the kind of hit that doesn't happen often in the new millennium -- a genuine word-of-mouth hit whose popularity grew steadily after its release, largely due to the sweet, sunny hit "This Love," a song sly and catchy enough to stay on the adult pop charts for years without wearing out its welcome. It also was catchy enough to engender years of goodwill. Five years of goodwill, in fact, as the band toured heavily while slowly tinkering away on their second album, finally delivering It Won't Be Soon Before Long (its title perhaps a pun on the gap between records, perhaps not) half a decade after Songs About Jane. If that delay sounds like a symptom of sophomore jitters, that's not exactly true, since during that long stretch between albums Maroon 5 worked Songs About Jane and, in a sense, that album wasn't strictly their first album, either. Maroon 5 evolved out of Kara's Flowers, a post-grunge pop band whose 1997 debut never took off, not even when their debut was reissued in the wake of Maroon's success, but it did provide the group with the foundation for their success; it's where they paid their dues and learned how to be a pop band. Traces of Kara's Flowers could be heard in Maroon's rockier moments on their debut, but under their new name, the group began to develop an infatuation with blue-eyed soul-pop, which they wisely develop on It Won't Be Soon Before Long. More than develop, they modernize it, borrowing elements of Justin Timberlake's stylized synthesized soul, but Adam Levine is wise enough to know that he's no young colt, like JT. He knows that he's a pop guy, somewhat in the tradition of Hall & Oates, but he isn't trying to be retro, he's trying to fill that void, making records that are melodic, stylish, and soulful, which It Won't Be Soon Before Long certainly is.

In every respect, It Won't Be Soon is a bigger album than its predecessor: hooks pile up one after another, there's not an ounce of fat on the songs, the production is so immaculate that it glistens. If there were lingering elements of Maroon 5's alt-rock past on Songs About Jane -- primarily in its lazy, hazy vibe -- they're gone now, replaced by the sleek, assured sound of a band that's eager to embrace its status as the big American mainstream pop band of the decade. But Maroon 5 isn't desperately grasping at the brass ring, they're playing it smart, building upon the core strengths of their debut and crafting a record that's designed to appeal to many different listeners, from teens crushing on Nelly Furtado's R&B makeover to adults looking for something smooth and melodic. It Won't Be Soon Before Long appeals to both audiences with an ease that seems effortless, but like any modern blockbuster, this album was shepherded by several different teams of producers, all brought in to emphasize a different personality within the group. The bulk of the record was cut with Spike Stent and Mike Elizondo -- Stent worked with U2, Oasis, Björk, and Gwen Stefani, while Elizondo had produced Fiona Apple and Pink -- but Queens of the Stone Age producer Eric Valentine was brought in for a couple of cuts, as was Mark Endert, who mixed "This Love." There may have been three different sets of producers, but the album is streamlined and seamless, never seeming calculated even if it was clearly made with an eye on mass appeal, and there are two reasons for that. First, Maroon 5 has gelled as a band, developing a clean, crisp attack that may bear traces of its influences -- there are knowing references to Prince, the Police, even OutKast sprinkled throughout (the keyboard on "Little of Your Time" is a direct nod to "Hey Ya") -- but it's a sound that's instantly identifiable as the band's own signature. Nowhere is that more evident than in how they can give soulful grooves like "If I Never See Your Face Again" a rock edge -- or how they can suddenly explode into shards of noise as they do on the coda of "Kiwi" -- or how when the electronic instruments dominate the production, the music still breathes like the work of an actual band, not like something that was constructed on a computer. But like with any good blue-eyed soul, the reason that this album works is the songs themselves. Even the flashiest production-driven tracks here -- the opening one-two punch of "If I Never See Your Face Again" and "Makes Me Wonder" -- aren't about feel; they're about the songs, which are uniformly tight and tuneful, sounding better with repeated plays, the way any radio-oriented pop should. If some of the ballads aren't as distinguished as the livelier tracks, they nevertheless are as sharply crafted as the rest, and the end result is that It Won't Be Soon Before Long is that rare self-stylized blockbuster album that sounds as big and satisfying as was intended.


have a great summer!!! much love



mike

Wikipedia

Wikipedia is a relatively new concept to me. Maybe I've been to the website before taking media studies but I don't know if I ever realized I was at Wikipedia.com. I also didn't know that it was created by consumers and could be edited. Now, I've really come to love Wikipedia. It's pretty much my first stop when I am searching for a term or details about a person. I've found it to be very useful in studying for exams. Like Jen and Melissa who take a break from studying to browse the internet, I do too. But a lot of the time I can get away with searching for something the teacher didn't necessarily cover in depth on Wikipedia, thus satisfying my internet craving. It really is helpful. There were so many terms to memorize and understand for all of my exams and without Wikipedia I doubt I would have covered most of them. It just makes finding information so easy and I like that. The only bad thing about it is that one of my professors wouldn't let me use it as a source for a paper. darn.

hahaha Paris may(not) be going to jail

So I was in the grocery store the other day and read that Paris Hilton is facing 45 days in prison. She was sentenced for violating her probation from a DUI. I find this funny because the reason that she violated her probation was because she did not know her guidelines. She also told the court that she has someone read her mail for her, which is another reason why she didn't know the guidelines. I like the trend of Hollywood sentencing celebrities lately. I think that they are so out of touch with reality that they need a reality check when they break the law. I assume that when they do serve time it is probably in a protected prison because they are "scared for their lives" due to their celebrity status which most likely ends up being like a spending 45 days in a resort which will probably end up being only 1/2 of that sentence which tax payers have to pay for so....I say just let her stay at home in her own little world.

Sunday, May 13, 2007

In response to (x2)

I am having the same problem as Jen has cited from her blog right now. Maybe not totally, but it is a common problem to stop mid paper and take an hr journey across the web. I read Jen's post and found it similar to the way some nights go in my paper writing world. I haven't really considered myself much of a procrastinator at all...until I discover some neat thing to go play with on the internet... but it really does take a lot of focus/drive to get anything done over a computer without spending an hour sidetracked sometimes. For instance, typing a paper I recently want to check my email, and I see on yahoo news that there has been a story broken about how Favre considered asking for a trade from the Packers. I read that story for 20 minutes, and when I get back to the paper, I have lost all train of thought. I smiled as I read the post, because I know that could be anyone...and it probably is...its me anyways some nights. It has indeed been a fun and intriguing journey through some of the media studies.

Spiderman 3

As you may have guessed from my title, my post is concerned with Spiderman 3. For once, things are actually going pretty well for Peter. He's dating Mary Jane, (the girl he's loved forever apparently) Spiderman is very popular, and his work is going well. Unfortunately, this starts to go to his head just as Harry decides to worm his way between Peter and MJ, his Uncle Ben's real killer reappears as the Sandman, and a symbiote which can enhance his abilities and his dark side gets a hold of him. As you could no doubt guess, the visual effects are awesome, especially with the ones showing him swinging through the air and the Sandman coalescing out of sand. And at least Mary Jane was a little useful and seemed more intelligent to me in this film. And the film was actually funny, even during the scene where Peter and Harry fight in Harry's home. You can tell that they may have superpowers, but at heart they're just two nerds duking it out. And when Peter is eying up all the women in the street you have to shake your head and wonder that he doesn't know how much more nerdy he looks. But sometimes I have to wonder why these movies are so popular. I don't have to question why the character is. But sometimes I felt like this was a kind of corny cult movie that Raimi has a habit of making with a huge budget. The dialogue was so corny that the whole audience actually burst out laughing. Maybe people (heck, me included) are so into the cool effects and the underdog story with the hopeless nerd that they're willing to tolerate it.

In response to...

In our last class period we talked about how the blogging part of the class could be improved. One of the suggestions was to respond, or add on, to other classmate's blogs. So, that is exactly what I am going to do for my last JMC 262 blog.

I just read Melissa's blog and I couldn't help but laugh. It's so true, except my vice is the Internet. I do a lot of school work on the computer so it's very tempting, mid paper writing, to take a "short" break and hop on Internet Explorer. From there, the "short" break usually turns into a half hour break or more. I usually have a list of bands written on my hand that people have told me to check out. So, I go to wikipedia to look up the band first, then I go to myspace music to listen to samples of the songs. If I like them, I continue on to amazon.com to see how inexpensively I could buy the cd. Once you look at one band on amazon.com, they usually give you a list of similar artists. From there, the cycle starts all over again, and it's a vicious one.

It sucks that I am a procrastinator...I wish I wasn't, but I am. And, it is something that I have just learned to accept about myself. This, however, will be my last round of finals that I will ever have to procrastinate for since I graduate in 6 days, 8 hours, 30 minutes and a few seconds...but, who is counting?

Good-bye JMC 262 blog...it has been fun!

Distractions

Recently, the remote control to my television 'broke' and we could not manually change the channel or do anything from the actual tv. During this two day stint of my tv being stuck on INPUT 2, I barely watched television, and got SOOOOOO much done! Once the tv was gone, I didn't even resort to the internet for entertainment...I actually wrote papers in a punctual manner, took my dog for a walk, etc.

I definitely won’t say that television makes people lazy… but lazy people seem to watch a lot of tv—and I am definitely a lazy person. Right now even, I have on the most random, distracting channel on (Style- Who’s Wedding is it Anyway!?) even though I have 4 exams to study for and a 15 page paper due.

I don’t know why turning the television off is such a struggle! Does anyone else have the same problem? Do I have major ADD? AM I ADDICTED?

Friday, May 11, 2007

Digital Billboards

I had to do a reseach and analysis project for another one of my classes and our topic was digital billboards. Yeah, I've noticed them before but never really paid attention to them. I remember the first time I saw one. I was driving westbound on I94 and its' brilliant light and colors caught my eye. I remember the advertisement and I also remember thinking that I never really pay attention to any billboards. Throughout the study for this class project, I realized how innovative digital billboard advertising really is. Clear Channel was having problems leasing out their billboard spaces for their full, desired year, so now they are trying something new. In addition to the catch-your-eye look they give consumers as they walk and drive by, they're able to change pictures, allowing more than one advertiser to buy time on their boards. Another thing I learned was that they are a trial run right now. Only two cities in the United States currently have digital billboards in them and Clear Channel is trying to decide if they are effective or not. I think they're cool. Maybe they shouldn't be super close to one another on places like highways because people are going to start staring at them instead of watching the roads, but I think that in terms of outdoor advertising they are the way to go. They're so bright and noticable that people, like myself, remember what they've seen later on. I have a feeling more and more cities in the United States are going to start seeing the brilliant lights of digital billboards real soon.

Folksonomy/Corporate Control

I found it interesting that the day after our class discussion of folksonomy and corporate control (bottom up and top down control/content), we discussed nearly the same thing in my history of media class. After talking about user-generated content and corporate ownership of popular websites on the internet, the professor asked us what direction we thought the internet what directed. It just got me thinking. I probably don't know enough about the subject myself, but it seems as though America has almost always been under some sort of corporate control and although the Internet has made much progress in giving consumers more power, I just don't see monumental changes in our social system anytime soon. Maybe I'm being pessimistic...any comments?

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Card catalogs...gross.

There are technologies in my life that I use daily, and I always wonder what people did before these wonderful things were invented. For example, the cell phone. Cells phones didn't become a HUGE things until my freshman year of college. I never had on in high school, and I didn't get one until I was a sophomore in college. Now, it is my only phone. My roommate and I both have cell phones and have ditched the land line. The computer! I spend hours infront of my computer this time of year (finals), writing papers, researching, etc. Or even, when I do venture into the library and physically check out a book, I wonder how people could have actually used card catalogs. I would have never made it through college. I'm not kidding.

The NewZ

I’m sure many of you have read the Shepherd-Express article “Why We Hate Local TV News.”(Article). I can see how this article could/did anger some local television personalities and stations, particularly those at WTMJ4, but this article just re-listed things that even casual viewers have known about and complained about for years – overly dramatic music, entertainment plugs, and “the team.”

The 30-minute news format is flawed—that’s not enough time to share ALL of the news…and it’s a lot of time to produce segments for everyday, multiple times a day. What’s actually newsworthy is rarely what is important, but it’s timely or funny.

In a class, my professor showed us several news clips…a few of hard news (aka world issues/events, real news) and a few of soft news (Look how cute the Pandas are!). Hard news stories often times elicited no response or emotion, but a particularly funny soft news story had the whole room laughing and wanting more!

Think about what might pull YOU into an episode of the Nightly News—not what’s happening in Iraq—but instead how American’s are spending out of control, or about how the most popular car on the market spontaneously combusts… human interest & wacky stories draw in the viewers. We’ve shown news outlets what we want…but yet studies show, and we personally say, that we are disappointed and want more important information and stories (what is socially/intellectually acceptable to say).

Gas Prices

I know that I am not the only one sick of putting $10 in the tank and not even getting half of a tank. I remember not to long ago that I could actually fill up for about $25, man I miss those days. It's like everytime I make some money I gotta put it in the tank. I mean after that I don't have nowhere to go but school because I'm broke. Sometimes I actually have to debate whether I want to put the whole twenty in the tank or just ten and keep ten for myself. Actually as I am typing this I am asking myself that question. I think I'm only going to put ten in the tank and keep the other ten.
My brother keeps bugging me about taking him places and he don't have no gas money so I want do it. Am I wrong? I don't think so. He even had the nerves to ask me to go and pick someone up for him for $2. I could have slap him right in his mouth just for even asking me something like that. It seems like people who don't have a car don't understand that cars need gas in order to run.
That's just something that was on my mind, now I gotta go put some gas in my car at least 3 gallons.

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

Yes yes, not yo grandmas internet now

Good evening sports racers. I would have to say that after discovering the show with Ze Frank I am now mildly addicted. After watching a few tonight I saw one that detailed a woman who made over a million dollars online selling...well..its kind of funnier if watched on the show. Otherwise I don't really have a lot to blog about really. The episode after gets even better as he describes his sophmoric attempts at humor on his show. I think the mentioning of web 2.0 in our final class today applies to this, even if it is sophmoric humor that is actually quite funny the way he does it.

Yes yes.


http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/archives/2007/01/011707.html

Sunday, May 06, 2007

Bye, Paris! 45 Days Without You...

Is anybody else crying out, "Justice has been served!"-- or is it just me?

Everyone's favorite (and I use the word favorite with sarcasm in mind here) Hilton is going to jail. I guess her charm and money couldn't get her out of this mess. I think it's about time that-- Paris served time.

Paris breached her driving ban and was caught, obviously. Ms. Hilton doesn't exactly rank up there with the most intellectual of criminal minds. It's really funny that Paris broke the law in such a manner. The girl is literally stalked by photographers-- didn't she think someone would notice she was driving when she wasn't supposed to be behind the wheel? Did she not realize that with her image splattered all over the pages of the tabloids that someone, maybe even a law official would say, "Gee, that's odd. Paris is in the front seat behind the driver's wheel. It almost appears as though she's driving."

Also, with all the money the girl has, did she really find it necessary to pilot a Range Rover (or whatever obnoxious vehicle of the week she has) in her six inch stiletto heels? Hi, Paris, it's called a limo. I'm pretty sure you could have afforded one...

Article 1
Article 2

I highly recommend reading the second article.

See you in 45 days, Paris. I'm sure you'll capitalize on this experience when you are released with a cheap novel or two. Hey, maybe even an interview on 20/20 where you claim you are a changed woman.

Oh, we, your adoring fans, can only hope.

Saturday, May 05, 2007

BLOBBING OUT

Because it's the end of the semester, and papers and exams haunt my nightmares, I have almost no time to take in any TV, movies, etc... When I'm done with my schoolwork, it's usually late, or I have no energy left to do anything fun. In times like these I need to "vedge out," or as my brother would call it, "blobbing out."

To reach a sufficient level of blob-ness, lately I've been watching "Beavis and Butthead." Yes, I know what you're thinking: "Beavis and Butthead" are animated Cro-Magnon-like retards from fifteen years ago meant for idiot teenagers. Well, as it just so happens, fifteen years ago I was fourteen and enjoyed "Beavis and Butthead" and therefore have a sweet spot for them now, in my late twenties.

I think everyone can relate. We tend to enjoy shows that we watched in our youth. And even if you may have outgrown them, they still tend to be, for the most part, watchable. So, my recent acquisition from Netflix was "Beavis and Butthead: The Mike Judge Collection" (the complete six disc series). Now I have tons of ultra low-brow humor to numb my brain when I need to "blob out." I think I'll try to get some "Tom Green Show" next....

Friday, May 04, 2007

spinoff

Last night ABC aired a two hour special of Grey's Anatomy and most it just turned out to a launch into Addison's (Kate Walsh) new spinoff that will be called Private Practice. The new show will be written by Shonda Rhimes and show Addison and her new practice in southern California.
I was very disappointed. I was expecting the full two hours to be about all the characters at Seattle Grace that we all have grown to love of the past seasons. I was even more disappointed with few scenes that we did see of Seattle Grace. All of a sudden Burke is getting cold feet? What? Meredith loses her stepmom and then her dad slaps her, with no reaction from all the doctors looking on. They just stood there as Meredith stormed off and her dad went into hysterics. Lame. Jane Doe can speak three languages and still doesn't remember who she is? I guess.
Even though some of the scenes from the original Grey's were questionable and not very entertaining, it is all just a set up for the season finale. I was reading some online tabloids and may have found out some answers to some of the questionable writing for this episode.
I guess that the show wrote itself into a corner after the February sweeps and off screen drama also played into what will be happening. I guess we just have to say goodbye to a show that is now going down hill.

entertainers

I was reading the Rolling Stone once again, and it got me thinking yet again. (Damn that magazine.) It was their 40th anniversary edition, so of course they had interviews with Bob Dylan, Paul McCartney, Ringo Star, George McGovern, Norman Mailer, Patti Smith, Jane Fonda, and a bunch of other big names I can't remember. Whenever I read those I wonder what it was about them exactly that made them household names we'll remember. Other people probably played like they did, wrote like they did, did what they did, had the same ideas. It also makes me wonder what went on behind the scenes then and now, and how their music and personas were shaped exactly. Well, given the huge number of books about celebs I guess I'm not the only one who thinks about such things...at least now we've got Entourage to answer those questions! Not that I know if that show has any truth to it, but you gotta love a show like that which seems to answer some of the questions that people have about how Hollywood works and how it's shaped by the personalities, drives, and ambitions of the people there. Although I must admit, I think that nowadays the entertainment industry usually distracts us more than anything else.

Thursday, May 03, 2007

It's the Internet as we know it...

Today I was on-line (surprise, surprise) and I came across this list on USAtoday.com. It's a list of the 25 innovations that shaped the 'net. It's similar to other lists we have look at in class, for example, the most visited websites, etc, but I thought it was still interesting to share with the class.

1. World Wide Web
2. E-mail
3. Graphical user interface
4. AOL
5. Broadband - no more dial-up! Yea!
6. Mosaic/Netscape
7. eBay
8. Amazon.com
9. Wi-fi
10. Instand Messaging
11. Yahoo!
12. Compuserve/Prodigy
13. The Well
14. Vices
15. Spam/Spyware
16. Flash
17. Online mapping tools
18. Napster
19. YouTube
20. The Drudge Report
21. Bloggers - clearly a big part of this class
22. Craigslist
23. Myspace - or, as I like to call it, mylife
24. Gaming
25. Google (actually google was number six, but I messed up typing the list...oops.)

Anyways, I'm sure everyone is more than framiliar with the 25 things on this list. It's amazing to think that 25 years ago, the Internet, as we know it, was just in the process of being created. Now, it is an enormous part of our everyday lives. It makes you wonder what is to happen next....

Chevy Ads

Here is an article in Wired about the Chevy Tahoe user-generated commercial fiasco that we discussed in yesterday's class.
The MBAs who populate ad agencies and corporate marketing departments spend years learning the art of control – what their cleverly calibrated messages should (and shouldn't) say, where they should appear, how often they should appear there, and what should appear nearby. Chevy decided to chuck all that and invite people to post their own commercial messages about America's best-selling SUV online, where the ads would be free to migrate to YouTube or anywhere else. Chevy supplied the video clips and music; users could then mix and match the material and add their own captions.

The contest ran for four weeks and drew more than 30,000 entries, the vast majority of which faithfully touted the vehicle's many selling points – its fully retractable seats, its power-lift gates, its relative fuel economy. But then there were the rogue entries, the ones that subverted the Tahoe message with references to global warming, social irresponsibility, war in Iraq, and the psychosexual connotations of extremely large cars. One contestant, a 27-year-old Web strategist from Washington, DC, posted an offering called "Enjoy the Longer Summers!" which blamed the Tahoe for heat-trapping gasses and melting polar ice caps. An entry called "How Big Is Yours" declared, "Ours is really big! Watch us fuck America with it." The same contestant (hey, no rules against multiple entries, right?) created an ad that asked the timeless question, "What Would Jesus Drive?" On its own Web site, the Tahoe now stood accused of everything but running down the Pillsbury Doughboy.
It continues with lots of background about the history of these innovative campaigns, including that of Converse, the sneaker company. It's worth checking out their website, especially the "made by you" area where they have short films inspired by the brand. (This is an example of involving users that didn't go wrong.)

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

HBO and The Wire

I am a huge fan of HBO programming… documentaries, dramas, comedies…ALL OF IT! In fact, I’ve recently become addicted to “The Wire.” This is the best cop show I have ever seen and one of the best shows on television right now– the detectives never have all the answers and every character is well developed and varied. Instead of doing a paper one night—I watched 7 episodes in a row and they are each a full hour long…oops!

In the first season, the cops and the gang (all the characters) are slowly revealed and it becomes evident that every character’s goal is to climb the ladder and gain more power…except for Detective McNulty–who is just a pain in everyone’s ass.

The Sopranos, Entourage, Curb Your Enthusiasm, Extras…and even Sex in the City (which is a great show when it’s not in censored syndication).

Which leads me to a major problem: All of my favorite shows are on cable, but not even basic cable…which I can’t afford… but PREMIUM cable…which I REALLY can’t afford.

Which leaves me with two choices: Downloading or buying the DVDs when they finally come out….I do both…but let’s just say I do a lot more of one than the other.

I just downloaded the last four episodes of The Sopranos (and I do actually own the box sets for this particular show). The first of the four episodes had over 100,000 downloads just from this particular bit torrent site. WHOA! Especially considering the fact that HBO (according to my knowledge) hired a private firm to try to diminish illegal downloading of their programming—doesn’t look like that’s working.

If HBO offered their shows streaming on the internet for a monthly fee…I would sign up in a heartbeat!! Although, that would probably really piss off Time Warner Cable and other Cable systems.