Taylor Swift's, "Love Story" Analysis

Taylor Swifts music video, "Love Story," takes place in an medieval Renaissance period. Since this video has a beginning, middle, and an end, this video is a narrative. It tells a story about the unrequited love between two people who are not allowed to be together but try anyways. This is the conflict. The video mirrors the idea of the play Romeo and Juliet.

The video starts at the end of the story and throughout the video, flashbacks of the two together are shown, which is what discontinuity editing does. She is imagining the two back in time.

Mise en Scene is used in this video through costumes and scenery. There is acting going on, since the two characters are playing the roles of Romeo and Juliet. When watching the video, you are suppose to feel like you are "in" the time frame of the 18th century. The use of daylight seemed to be very important when shooting this video. The bright sunshine is shown in several shots with high key lighting. During the nighttime scenes, there is very high contrast, with low key lighting.

The video is shot using shallow and deep space between the two characters and props. The cameras use panning/lifting as well as tracking/craning. They seem to be zooming in some of the shots, like when she is stationed in the castle, singing on the balcony. When they are in the field, running towards one another, the cameras are following the characters, and then circle around them. The camera moves pretty quickly throughout the video.

There are a lot of angles shown in this video as well. Cinematography is shown through high and low angles of the singer when she is by herself and during the dancing scenes. All the different shots are used here, (ELS, LS, MS, MCU, CU, and ECU). There are two ECU shots. One shows the two characters holding hands, and the other shows Swift picking berries.

The video does a good job in expressing the characters personalitys. Juliet, played by the artist, is shown as an inocent girl who is awaiting for her prince. I think the lighting, costumes, make-up and scenery were all chosen very carefully and all worked perfectly for the video. Taylor Swift is one of my favorite artists, and although I have seen this video before this assignment, I still enjoyed it like the first time I saw it.

Dwight Yoakam Video Analysis

Turn It ON Turn It Up Turn Me Loose



The Turn it Up, Turn it On, Turn me Lose video begins in black and white, showing a lot of contrast between the outside world through windows in the room. It also begins as a narrative, and opens as a clock ticking is heard in the diegesis. The camera pans around the messy room, showing odd objects up close. Dwight is shown sleeping, then an alarm wakes him up.

The narrative continues temporally and spatially, the camera tracks to follow him through the house then outside to his car. The contrast decreases and the entire scene is a deeper staging, showing more than one plane; him, the car, and the background that's an empty parking lot. The car doesn't start and an odd guy in a straight jacket named Toad (his name is identified by Dwight yelling it) has Dwight's distributor cap and he threatens to smash it. The camera goes to and from Dwight and Toad in close up shots and is spatially continuous, but the camera angles on Dwight are straightforward, while the camera angle on Toad is from below which gives Toad a more distorted look to help accentuate his personality. They exchange some heated words, then the next camera shot is on the ground next to the distributor cap being smashed by Toad while Dwight looks on in the background.

The next shot is in slow-motion and is a medium shot of Dwight, pulling a gun out of his back pocket. He aims the gun to the side of the camera (aimed at the spatially contiuous area that Toad is located), and it fills up the view. He fires the gun. The cinematography shows a deep depth of field, focusing primarily on the gun, while Dwight, then his smoking car appear less in focus. The next few shots show Toad get onto a bike with a woman to get away; an extreme long shot shows they're in some sort of a canyon. Dwight fires a few more shots in a medium close up shot, misses, looks at his watch and has a worried look on his face.

The next shot is temporally continuous in that it is chronological, but temporally discontinuous in that there is some time between the scene preceding it and the following scene, but it's guessed that it's within a few hours of them. It begins by showing Dwight looking at his watch then having a few more shots explaining the difficult time getting to the place where he needs to be, which is a big, run-down looking building. He bangs on the door in angst.

When the door opens, the shot changes to the camera being inside the building, with a medium shot of Dwight outside. The visual style changes to color, with increased contrast of the bright outside world and the dimly lit inside of the building. A man has opened the door for him and Dwight falls to the floor in exhaustion. This scene changes to a non-narrative, focusing primarily on painting a scene for the lyrics of the song. Now there is discontiued editing, and there is a Dwight on stage while there is still the Dwight from the previous narrative scenes in the crowd of this concert. There are extreme long shots that show a mise en scene of a crowded room full of gamblers, women swinging from saddles hung from the ceiling, cocktail waitresses and smoke clouds the view of the camera. There are various medium shots and medium close ups on different characters to help describe the room and its visitors. The camera shots explaining the room are panned and tilted but also tracking and craning around the room. Spot lights add contrast to the lighting all around the room, showing that what is going on is somewhat of a spectacle. During a few shots you can see some bleachers up above all the interesting characters down below.

The close ups of Dwight on stage are in focus and often behind some unidentified out-of-focus objects, showing a deep depth of field with two planes. The lighting behind Dwight is sometimes flashy and bright with short stints of contrast. The camera pans the stage going from close up to medium close up shots, the camera is tracking around Dwight.

Dwight's original character is also in the room, still looking exhausted and being the object to the lyrics to show a small continuation of the beginning narrative, and to add the style of the entire video together with the song itself.

"Lucky"

I chose to analyze the music video Lucky by Britney Spears. The video is a narrative video because it tells a story. It talks about a girl named Lucky who is so sad because although she is a star, she is missing so much from her life. It takes us through sequences where we see her waking up in a beautiful hotel room, accepting flowers from an admirer, accepting an award: all while she struggles with the cost of fame.

Looking at the video from a visual standpoint, many different elements are used. In regards to the mise en scene, the video begins with using contrasting lighting between bright and dim. The billboard shown with Luckys' face on it uses a high key lighting, whereas the buildings behind it uses low key lighting. This is to emphasize what the audience is supposed to be looking at- Britney on the billboard, while creating a night backdrop for the shot. The cinematography used is also interesting. In the same opening shot of the billboard, we see that camera is using an extreme long shot, and then zooms in very quickly to show a medium-close up of Britney. Throughout the video, so many ranges are used. Another extreme long shot shows Britney going to answer the door, a high shot of her accepting flowers, close-ups of just Britney herself; almost every shot is implemented in this video. The video also uses visual techniques by showing Britney as Lucky and Britney as Britney in shots together. Obviousl, we know there is only one Britney, but they have edited it in a way that we can see Britney as both of these characters in the same scene.

Love Story

This week I chose the Song "Love Story" by Taylor Swift. It is a Narrative form. It has a beginning middle and end. It starts with a girl in high school and she has a fantasy, Cinderella story. She dreams that she is Juliet and her father will not let her be with Romeo. In the video they show her and her Romeo dancing, they are dressed in old English clothes. They are dancing an old dance that would have took place at that time. It shows them kissing in the garden and acting like they had to hide that they were there and be quiet so nobody heard them. The conflict in the story is definitely the fact that this is a sort of forbidden love because they are not supposed to be together. The conflict ends when Romeo gets her fathers permission and the video shows them running up to each other, happy that they get to be in love. A shot then goes back to her at her high school and the same boy that was Romeo in her fantasy ends up being a boy at her school and he comes up to her and they are together as well. The story in the song and the video show a perfect video in narrative form.

Faith No More is Back Together!

So I am excited to say that Faith No More is getting back together. The latest news is that they’ll be touring in Europe this summer. That’s all. The reason I’m happy is because of Mike Patton, the lead singer. He took over after they fired Chuck Mosby for being rude, drunk and unhelpful in promoting the band. Mike Patton took over and came out with hit Epic, on the album The Real Thing, that went platinum. That really put them on the map as far as main stream music goes, but they never stayed there. It’s my personal opinion, but I don’t think they really wanted to be there or stay there. Mike Patton took the band to different platforms, making different sounds by changing it up a bit and moving away from the 90s rock music that was also coming out at the time. They called it quits in 1998 to pursue other things, and put an end to rumors about quitting, so they quit.

But Mike Patton kept on making music, creating and joining new bands, and really exploring what his vocals could do. He was part of Lovage on their album Music To Make Love to Your Old Lady By, Peeping Tom, which was one album where every song featured another artist. The type of music is labeled “experiemental/ghettotech”. Peeping Tom’s most popular track, “Mojo” can be interpreted in many different ways, but its music video mocks television shows by recreating movements, visuals, camera shots, among other things to shows or commercials. Before Faith No More, Mike Patton created Mr. Bungle, which is very post modern in terms of music; adding different vocals, sounds, and noises and retracted from the ‘verse, chorus, verse, chorus, solo, chorus’ convention. Mr. Bungle is certainly a different way of making music.

I don’t know what the future holds for Faith No More, but I’ll be sure to be first in line when they come to the Midwest or any other place I’d be willing to travel to see them. I’m really excited to hear the new music they’ll come up with, and I’m hoping Patton will include some other artists he’s worked with before (including the beat boxer ‘Butterscotch’) to add another side to Faith No More that we haven’t seen.

The Denny's Mafia

This Denny's Super Bowl commercial appears to be in the form of a narrative. Although you don't see the beginning or end you can conclude from the information where it is going, and what has already happened.

These three men are in a meeting about someone they know who may have ratted them out. Benny, the person who supposedly "talked", has caused this meeting. The conclusion to the Benny story isn't fully in words, but when one of them says "I think it's time we let everyone know what happens to people..." you can assume they plan on doing something to Benny based on any preconceived notion of what gangsters do.

The mise en scene of this particular commercial also helps portray these men as mafia or mobsters. They have their Italian accents, and they are dressed in stereotypical mafia clothing. The lighting of the scene is pretty bright, where it looks like it may be very early morning.

Since this is shot in a Denny's they also have the set right. Many booths for seating, and the waitress is dressed up in a uniform with a name tag. The shot of the table also shows the different kinds of syrups, and three plates of widely accessorized pancake platters.

The cinematography includes mostly medium close ups, except for the opening shot which is more of a long shot to establish the location. The camera angle is straight for the conversation between the men, until the waitress comes in with the whipped cream. Then there is a low angle shot of her applying the whipped cream, and a high angle shot of the smiley face she is applying to the pancakes. There also appears to be some sort of fuzzy filter applied to the camera, which gives me the feeling of The Godfather movie.

The editing of this scene is a transparent spatio-temporal continuity where it presents a scene in a single space and time, where the scene holds many different shot and then reverse shot angles.

I think the production of this commercial was very successful in humor and getting their message out at the same time. The "serious breakfast" slogan allows them to have a scene where it appears to be very serious, more or less about the death of one of their friends, which then allows them to show these "tough guys" getting very childish platters of pancakes.

I Should be Dead by Now

Dennis Rodman is one of the most interesting popular culture figures of the current generation, in addition to being one of the biggest attention-whores, so it comes as no surprise that he has authored two books. I Should be Dead by Now has more of an angle on his post-basketball life, including the end of his career, than does Bad as I Wanna be, his first book. Rodman struggles with faithfulness, alcoholism, and many philosophical issues in the book, and when he takes a serious tone, the book is actually quite more than simple entertainment. At points in the book, sections called "Reality Check" highlight important points and nail them into the reader's head. It seems that Rodman doesn't want us to make some of the same mistakes as him--the all-night partying, failed relationships because of polygamy, and not realizing family is important, among others--and opens up to us as a result. His wild stories definitely provide the entertainment aspect, however, as he relates many of his trysts with women, booze, and bizarre adventures along the way. If ever there were a candidate for a reality show before reality television became big, Rodman in about 1997 or so would have been it. He is one of the few popular culture figures that transcends not only the game he plays (basketball), but social issues as well (gender, sexuality, etc.), and that definitely comes across in an entertaining, insightful book.

For my textual analysis blog I have chosen to write about "The Office" which airs on NBC on Thursday nights. It is one of my favorite shows and I cannot get enough of it! There are so many scenes that I wanted to include but I found one that gives a great example at how this show is filmed. "The Office" is pretty much self explanatory; it's about a group of people that work in an office setting for Dunder Mifflin Paper Company. Being a fan of the show, I had to of course choose a classic moment of Jim messing with Dwight. The filming of this scene shows how any other scene would be filmed on the show. It is a very unique filming sequence, complete with added sit-down "Real World" confessions of the characters to aid in explaining the narrative conflict. Although this scene doesn't have a character's confession, it has everything else that helped make "The Office" a success. I love how the filming includes alot of depth staging; the camera is always moving in and out to show an up close shot as well as a surrounding shot. It's the kind of filming that makes you feel like you are there witnessing the action first hand. The most important part of the filming would have to be the shot scale and camera movement. The camera is always moving up and down, back and forth, side to side; you name it. This also adds to the lifelike experience of the show. Most of the shot scales are between medium short and close-up of the character's face in order to see their emotion. When in conversation, the camera does alot of panning and tilting around the characters to allow the viewer to have a convincing analysis of what is being presented. Watch this scene to understand what I mean; have a chuckle or two!

The Baddest Girls on TV

I made a vow to be more selective with the reality shows I choose to watch, but I must admit one of my many guilty pleasures is watching Oxygen's The Bad Girls club season three! Drama, Backstabbing, and lots of partying are the ingredients that make up the hit reality show. The style of the show uses multiple cameras to show the seven girls living under one extremely huge and expensive roof and all that goes on, both at the house and when the girls are out on the town, which is mainly at nightclubs getting in to fights. This narrative TV show contains tons of conflict between the girls in the house from the common "he said, she said" to your normal cliques emerging between the girls, which is all aired for the world to see. But outside the drama that goes on between the girls, there is supposed to be true meaning behind taking seven wild behaving women and forcing them to live together for six months and that is to inspire change. Through the experience each girl is supposed to somehow change her ways, kick her bad habits and come out after her stay as a changed and matured woman. The most entertaining part of watching the show is seeing each girl struggle with this inner conflict they have. And of coarse the ones they have with each other!

Here is a clip of the show if you've never caught an episode!

Tiger's Back Nike Commercial

This is the new Tiger Woods commercial, after his 8 month layoff he is back on the PGA tour.  This commercial is in a narrative form, and uses dialog and music to tell the story.  It starts with the two announcers telling the audience that Tiger Woods will not be in any more golf events for a while.  They use close up shots of other players faces and they are all smiling, having a good time.  The camera was not on a tripod, so a lot of the shots are moving, giving the commercial even more excitement.  The music drives the narrative, and the lyrics are describing things that are fun and associated with a good time.  It shows all the players winning, popping champaign, going to events, and having the time of their lives because Tiger is out of competition.  Then they are sitting in the locker room talking when the music stops and Tiger Woods walks through.  Their faces drop and the last shot is of the player dropping his head because he knows that the good times are over now that Tiger is back.  The narrative uses framing, music, editing, and dialog to drive the commercials short story.

If I Were a BOY

If I were a Boy by Beyonce, raised brows across the nation. So many women could relate to putting their cheating, lying boyfriends in their shoes to see how it feels to be hurt, time and time again. This video tells a woman's familiar story about relationships, and how men just dont get it. I would categorize this music video as a narrative because it tells a story. Its composed of events that are linked together, and by the roles being reversed in the video meaning Beyonce's playing the male role, makes it even more of a narrative because its telling a story visually.Even though it doesn't come out until the end of the video when the roles switch back to Beyonce being the Secretary and her husband is the police officer it was still clever and unique how this narrative was told. we thought Beyonce was the villain so to speak in how she was portrayed in her video, cheating, not answering phone calls, leaving her husband worried because she ignores his phone calls, and acting dumb founded as to why he's upset, and this is all conflict. The song is a conflict in itself and the video does a nice job of reflecting this aspect. Another important factor is it has a plot, and different scenes to keep the audience following the story and whats going on. Just by watching the video, the audience gets to know the characters, the situation and the conclusion. You can almost look at this video as a mini movie, leaving the audience wanting more and raising questions like, what happened next, did she leave him for good, did he come to his senses or are they back together?

Britney Video

Here is the video for Circus.

Stella Ad

We watched this today.

The Girls Next Door split

"The Girls Next Door," is a reality show based on three girls lives that all live in the Playboy mansion. This last season came to an end when Kendra decides to move out of the mansion to move on to bigger and better things. She claims she wants to pursue a relationship she had started with an NFL player. She buys her own "mini mansion," and breaks the news to Hugh Heffner with tears.

Bridget, gets the opportunity to host her own show, "Bridget's Beaches," which deals with prime vacations spots. She leaves the mansion and is said to be gone for four months. Sad about leaving, she claims she will be back.

Holly the prime girlfriend to Hugh Hefner, is the only one of the three girls to have something going on in her life other than Playboy. She evaluates herself in the last two episodes, and it looks as if she doesn't want to be there anymore.

I just wonder what these girls are going to do but then I see commercials for a new show about Kendra. It looks like another reality show based on her life. It seems like she isn't really moving away from what she was already doing. Her new show is self titled.... "Kendra."

I really like this show and was sad that the trio broke up. I'm looking forward to the other 2 shows that will be on "E!"

The "Girls next door," is going to have a new season, but I really don't know how well it's going to do without the three girls that started it all....I guess we will see!

Over the Hill...

In an article in Sunday's Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, I learned someone very well known to people around the world is celebrating her 50th birthday on March 09, yet she has no wrinkles or shows any signs of aging at all. Who is it you ask? It's Barbie, of course!!!!

That's right; the toy from Mattel known worldwide as Barbie Doll is having her 50th birthday this year. To me, it feels like just yesterday I was playing with my own Barbie dolls, dressing them up to go to parties and on dates with Ken (I had 17 Barbies and only one Ken doll, what a lucky one he was!) So many girls like myself grew up with Barbie and have many great memories playing with her, it's no wonder why she remains on shelves today.

The article itself was really interesting, including 50 facts about her life. Some of the ones I liked included:

#7) In a series of novels published by Random House in the 1960's, Barbie's parents were George and Margaret Roberts who lived in the fictional town of Willows, Wisconsin.

#24) Barbie has had more than 1 billion pairs of shoes.

#45) Teacher Barbie was recalled in 1995 because she wasn't wearing underwear.

#49) Sales of Barbie were outlawed in Saudi Arabia in 2003.

Among these facts, some of the most interesting figures included that of Barbie's value. The most expensive Barbie ever sold was for $7,999.99, a No.1 1959 Ponytail Barbie. And, the current estimated price of the original 1959 Barbie in mint condition is a whopping $27,450!!! Obviously, Barbie has had a huge impact on not only American culture, but international as well, and to that I say, Happy Birthday, Barbie!!!!

Late Night Television

As I'm sure most of you all know. But come tomorrow night, Jimmy Fallon is set to take over the reigns of the show "Late Night" on NBC as Conan O'Brein has left the show to begin preparation for him to replace Jay Leno on "The Tonight Show."

You can read an article about Fallon and all of his thoughts about his new career move here. But more or less, Fallon is excited about his new gig but says he is a little nervous.

I personally like the choice of Fallon to replace Conan on the show. I never really liked much of his movies but I loved him on Saturday Night Live and I believe that Fallon's style of comedy will be more conducive for late night television.

But, on the other hand. I am not liking the idea of Conan replacing Leno on "The Tonight Show." I do like Conan and his comedy routines but I just don't believe that Conan has the star power to run "The Tonight Show." I think Conan is a person that thrives in that "Scottie Pippen" role and not so much the lead role or the "Michael Jordan" role.

I do hope he does well though. I would never wish no ill will against him.

Time will only tell how things turn out.

AllMonster.com

I was told I should blog on my website, www.AllMonster.com, this week. AllMonster is a site I created to share my passion for the world of monster trucks that I have had since I was three years old. It has made me a bit of money, but that's not why I do it. I wanted to create a place that was free of rumors, myths, and the like about the sport, and was a "just the facts" type of place to go for the drivers, crew, and fans that enjoy the sport and its positive aspects. I have interviews, photos, sponsors, videos, and much more there, and encourage anyone to check it out. What is traditionally viewed as a "hick" or "redneck" sport has come a long way, and I hope that someone will find the site and enjoy it as much as I enjoy running it. THanks!

Appeal in the boring, uneventful and everyday

It has become a common thread in contemporary television: the glamour of ordinary people doing ordinary things in ordinary environments under ordinary circumstances. As audience members, we just seem to crave entertainment that affirms our own lives, jobs, families and relationships. It somehow makes us feel that we're a little bit cooler, a little bit classier, a little bit more exciting when we know Hollywood's interested in the daily, hum-drum activities of receptionists, warehouse workers, diner owners, waitresses, and hospital interns like ourselves.

From Seinfeld to Friends to The Office to Grey's Anatomy: just think for a moment of the various TV programs (mostly talking about comedy here, with a few exceptions) you've been faithful to in recent years. It's very likely that they each have at least one cast member, if not the entire cast, who gets painted as the ordinary joe or jane. And this is done entirely with you and me in mind. I can at least speak for myself in saying that it makes me feel better about my pittance of a paycheck and the fact that no one may notice who I am or what job I've done when I'm getting a weekly does of the Hollywood version of such a life.

In a warped way said Hollywood version always gives me a boost of pride in where I'm at, what I do and who I am, rightly or wrongly so. It just goes to show you that media makers have power over their audiences and use it to their advantage. We tune in because it's fun to watch someone doing the same things we do and getting a whole hell of a lot of admiration for it.

The Neighborhood of Make Believe

So last week I had the flu and Wednesday afternoon I accidentally overdosed on cough medicine. And no, it wasn't fun or funny. It was a legitimate inappropriate temporary overdose. Anyway, after I'd watched just about all my dvds from being stranded in my room I realized I was scraping the bottom of the barrel and reached for a dvd my mom bought me for christmas, which was a few episodes of Mr. Rogers. I figured this would be the only time I'd ever watch it.

Growing up, I always watched him, but he always took a backseat to Sesame Street. But the neighborhood of Make Believe was always my favorite on his show. Being in the odd state I was in I imagined myself being back in my 6 or 7 year old frame of mind and watched it and took it in like I did when I was a kid.

What a great guy Fred Rogers was. Boring maybe but he reached out to all kids. The episode I watched the closest was when he went to a restaurant. He told the viewer about seating, waiting, the menu, the waitstaff, the cooks, how its made, and the bill. I vaguely remmeber watching it when I was little, and realized how such a small, boring, and seemingly pointless episode had a profound effect on me. Even though his restaurant trip was different than any of mine, as a child when I did go to a restaurant I had a heads up from Mr. Rogers. I knew what to expect whenever I went to a restaurant.

So if it was boring yet educational, what type of entertainment is that? Is it entertainment? I think the Mr. Roger's Show is sort of like the Daily Show. It's got some useful, some pointless content, but its main purpose to to inform people of necessary information, and adds extra interesting fluff (Daily show humor, Mr. Rogers Make Believe land) to help the flow of info into our cluttered minds. I'm glad I grew up with Mr. Rogers.

Cds will join floppy disks in the afterlife!

In case you didnt know, now you do! The end has come near for the era of the compact disk or better known as the CD. There has been buzz around its end in the music industry for some time now but now it has branched of into all areas that CDs touch. From DVDs to blue-ray and HD DVD optical disks, according to free software magazine, they will all become apart of yesterday's or rather more appropriately yester-year's technology. Why is this you ask? Its simple. Just as technology advanced and inevitably pushed the floppy disk, vinyl albums and the eight tracks tapes into non-existence, as technology continues to advance especially with computers, so must methods of storing and distributing information, music, and movies. Its about getting these by-products to consumers in the most convenient, easiest and cost efficient ways. The next logical question then is what is to come next? Well we already have a widespread use of flashdrives which can hold a much higher volume of information from pictures and music to documents. There is talk that music companies will sell music on memory cards. The bottom line is that more people would rather download their music and movies, whether legally or illegally, online and the sales of Cds have dropped. These memory cards are speculated to be compatible with cell phones and mp3 players. So just as we have all masterd the art of ripping Cds and now can afford to buy DVD players without breaking the bank, soon and very soon it will time to re- adjust to a new way to consume, but isnt that what we as a society are good at? I think so!

The Unfilmable Movie..

As luck would have it, in one of my Comparative Literature classes, we are currently reading the extremely well regarded graphic novel Watchmen. This happens to coincide with the release of the film version of the graphic novel. This is my first go around with the reading of it, but as I have read throughout various websites, this is considered the unfilmable comic book.

For those unfamiliar with Watchmen, the story takes place in an alternate 1985, a world where costumed superheroes do exist. Each of the story's heroes bring a number of flaws behind their masks, presenting a sense of realism and avoiding giving us the well liked perfect hero. It was a twelve-part series that many considered unfilmable due to it's length and the amount of detail in each of the novel's drawings, giving the reader a sense of what the world of Watchmen is really like. Below is the movie trailer. It remains to be seen if the movie as a whole is well executed, but the trailer gets me excited.

The Best of Friends

I was watching the television show friends the other day and saw what I think is the funniest episode ever. I also think this ties into what we were talking about in class on Wednesay. Friends is taped with a live studio audience. In this case I think it really works because the viewers are laughing just as hard as the audience, or at least I was. I think in the case of Friends the studio audience adds to the show because it offers a place for laughter and I think the actors feed off of it as well.
Another episode that I thought is probably the second funniest show is the "leather pants" episode. Again here the audience adds to the humor in the episode. I think it is also better for the actors because it allows them in improvise more throughout the scene depending on what is and isn't funny. I think the character Ross is really good at this, obviously because he is in both of the episodes that I chose. I think he really plays off of the audiences feedback, and does a great job of it!

LOST

What happened to "Lost?" It was my favorite show for a few years, and last season it became unable to comprehend. In the beginning it was like, "Wow, John Locke can walk even though he's paralyzed. Cool! What an enigma!" or "The Doctor is a real heartthrob; he heals all wounds with vodka." Now I find myself thinking, "What just happened...which storyline was that from...wait...what???" That's when I remind myself that watching a show I hate isn't a wise use of time.

My biggest problem with "Lost", regardless of how trivial it may seem, is the four-toed foot statue. A show can leave a lot of loose ends and still redeem itself, but throwing a giant stone Muppet foot on a time traveling island and leaving the viewer hanging on what the hell it's there for is where I draw the line.



Have you ever had a friend that tells really long stories? Like, the person you avoid setting off because they're likely to launch into a story about nothing and forget why they started telling it to you in the first place? I feel like the writers of "Lost" are like that person. They started out with good intentions and ended up going off into a million ridiculous tangents.

Maybe I just don't get it? Maybe "Lost" is just a show for geniuses. Maybe the intricacies of "Lost" are 'lost' on me (I couldn't resist). Ehh, maybe not.

A Surprising Win for Kate Winslet

This past Sunday, I was glued to my tv watching the Oscars. This year was especially exciting for me because I had seen most of the movies that had been nominated for numerous categories. When I saw the movie "Doubt" I did indeed have no doubt that Meryl Streep would be nominated and most likely win for Best Actress for the year of 2009. Her performance of a Catholic nun was impeccably accurate, it was as if she once was a nun. I was blown away by her performance and I'm sure alot of others had the same opinion as myself. I of course was surprised when Kate Winslet won and it upset me a bit because I did not get a chance to see "The Reader." Now that she has won it gives me a cue that maybe I should check out the movie. When she made her acceptance speech, I had to give Kate credit because of her decency of recognizing the other "goddesses" in her category and giving special credit to Meryl as well. Her speech was sincere and gracious, much like the academy had recognized and honored her for her role in "The Reader." I do like Kate Winslet in the roles that she has played and she has been around for a while so I assume this is finally her time to shine. Check out her acceptance speech and see what you think of Kate. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NA1E8FHw7LI

WHy?????

Why does the media/society put more emphasis on what a celebrity is wearing, compared to their nomination or the WINNERS, and if they were even deserving of the little gold man? When huge award shows approach, like the Grammy's and the most recent Oscar's all eyes are focused on the bling, hairstyles who the evening gown and or tuxedo was designed by. Not only are the audiences anxious to see how radiant Angelina Jolie appears but the celebs themselves go the extra mile to make sure they make the best dressed page in popular magazines. Here Angelina is wearing her hair in a half updo which hangs over here black elegant gown designed by Elie Saab with emerald Lorraine Schwartz drop earrings. Personally I've never heard of neither one of these designers and Im pretty sure Im not the only one. Is it necessary to mention these sort of things when referring to a a prestige award show such as this one? Or should the focus be more on her nomination? and how she felt when she didnt when Best actress? This is showing how shallow our worlds has become when we put too much emphasis on fashion then the reality of award shows.

Accepting in the Afterlife

So one of Hollywood's biggest events just happened yesterday, The Academy Awards. I decided to watch a bit of the red carpet, and then I tuned in just as they were doing the awards for best supporting actor. The nominees were Josh Brolin, Robert Downey Jr., Philip Seymour Hoffman, Heath Ledger, and Michael Shannon. And just as I had thought, the winner was Heath Ledger. Now don't get me wrong, I think he did a great job as the Joker in The Dark Knight, but I don't exactly think it's fair he was nominated, or won. I know this sounds mean, but I think a lot of people only saw the movie because it was the last one he filmed before he died, and I think a lot of people voted for him because of that. Not only that, but I think Hollywood has a tendency to make a bigger deal out of celebrities after they die, especially when someone dies from drug abuse. It's almost as if it makes them more iconic. Look at Jim Morrison, Marilyn Monroe, and Anna Nicole Smith. Although they were famous before they passed, it's as if their deaths have immortalized them and we look at them as more intriguing because of it. I think the same holds true with Heath Ledger. Before he died, he was barely talked about, or celebrated for his contributions in the acting world. Besides the Dark Knight, I can only remember him from A Knight's Tale, all the way back in 2001. Even though I don't agree with it, Heath Ledger now has an Oscar, and I'm sure it won't be the last time we honor someone not because of their talents, but because of a tragedy they were a part of. Sad, but true.

Pandora Radio

One thing I think is absolutely great is this website called pandora, and if you haven't checked it out yet I would highly suggest it. Basically you just make your own account, type in favorite band or favorite tune and it creates a playlist that has music similar to it. Probably the best thing about it is that its unedited. Before I do anything on my laptop, I go to this website and please my ears everytime I do something on my comp. If you feel like completely changing the genre of music just type in a different artist or song and enjoy. At the dorms, I don't get to download music illegally, so pandora is my next best option, but now since I know about it, I'm probably going to be using it for years to come.

Buying What Confessions of a Shopaholic is Selling

Now I probably would have never seen the movie Confessions of a Shopaholic but my girlfriend wanted to see it on Valentines day so I pretty much had to see it. I went in there hoping that the movie would be slightly entertaining, but as it turns out it is actually quite a good movie with a good message.

The story is about a girl named Rebecca Bloomwood who, as the title says, is addicted to shopping. She lives in a small apartment with her friend, but owns enough high fashion clothing to start her own department store.

Not only is Rebecca addicted to shopping, but she is in debt way over her head. She and her friend calculate all her debts and during this process it is clear she has a serious problem based on her reasoning for some of her purchases.

Rebecca then decides she needs to find a job and attempts to get a job at a high fashion magazine, but when she accidentally sends her letter to a finance magazine, the manager there finds her letter to be quite "metaphorical" to finance.

She ends up writing for the financial magazine using metaphors about shopping and becomes world renowned for her articles. Through her popular articles she ends up meeting the women who runs the fashion magazine she has dreamed about writing for, and puts on a pretty good impression with her.

Throughout this whole process she continues to ,and continues to fall deeper in to debt. She attempts to go to a shopaholics class, but it doesn't appear to affect her shopping decisions.

Rebecca is then outed on national television on a spin off of "Good Morning America" buy a debt collector who has attempted to contact her for months. This leads the financial magazine to cut their ties with her and she is again jobless.

Rebecca jobless, but still having her good impression she set on the women who runs the magazine of her dreams is given an opportunity to write for her dream job. Rebecca is offered the job to write a article in the magazine for "affordable fashion" but realizes the things she is going to be selling aren't affordable at all, and are exactly the same things she has been put into debt with. She then has one of those movie moments where she preaches about how she "doesn't feel good" about doing that, and preaches about how she has changed and so on.

She ends up turning down her dream job because she has cut ties with the idea that she needs material possessions in order to live a happy life. She ends up selling all of her high end clothing to build up enough cash to pay off all her debts.

This is a pretty brief description of what the movie is about. There is a love story in there which of course is resolved in the end and the girl falls in love with the boy, but I believe the message of this movie is a pretty good one.

Being a shopaholic is a very real problem we have in America and this movie actively speaks out against it. They show a women who is absolutely attached to her material possessions give them all up in the end because she realizes that they are not what she needs in the world. They show what is really important are friends, family, and love.

I don't believe this is a very materialistic movie regardless of how many different designers were viewed in this movie. The message is a very positive one that may be help enough for someone who has a shopping problem to get help, or may allow someone who believes they need material possessions to change their views.

I myself don't like when people always need "nice" or "new" things in order to be happy, and if they were given something used they wouldn't be happy at all. But I am buying the message that Confessions of a Shopaholic is selling.

The New World of Televison

Written by TIME Magazine's resident TV critic, Jame Poniewozik (Yes, I know. I have been wearing out TIME Magazine on the class blog). Comes this article about his trials and tribulations when his TiVo died over his Thanksgiving week last year. Initially Poniewozik explains that he felt like he was being "cut off from the main pipeline of American media life."

But, unsurprisingly Poniewozik quickly adapted and began to either go to websites, such as
Hulu.com, that offers television for free or iTunes to watch shows on his iPhone and on the go.

Interestingly enough, Poniewozik even says now that there are certain shows that he now only watches online or through his iPhone.

Man vs Wild

I was watching Man vs Wild and the crazy adventures he goes on shock me. For a little explanation behind the show, Bear the main character is dropped off in the the middle of nowhere and has to survive until he can find a way out. He has to do all things possible to get out, and sometimes you watch and can't believe your eyes. To start off, the things he eats are borderline unbearable to watch. I cringe at the thought of anybody ever having to eat some of the things he does. For example yesterday when I was watching he caught a fish, bit it's head off, and gnawed into the rest of it, scales and all. Yesterday the episode that I watched was one when he went to Romania and it was probably the most bizarre one I have seen yet. It seems to me that he puts his life in so much danger to do some of the things that he does for television. Like scaling mountains and climbing through small caves. I couldn't ever imagine doing something like that. He is either brave or stupid, I haven't quite figured out which one it is yet. It is not something I would normally watch on TV but when you turn it on you get sucked into watching it to see what will happen next and if he will be able to get out by himself and still alive at that. I think from a consumer perspective it was a really good idea to do something like this, other than survivor man there is nothing else like it. The main character, Bear is really likable once you start watching the show, you start rooting for him to make it.

Oscar Sunday

Sooo I know the Oscars are approaching and I'm getting pretty excited! I think that there is a lot of potential for a great race, with the winner for best picture pretty up in the air. I've seen one of the movies in the running, "The Reader", which I really enjoyed. I also heard that "Milk", "Slumdog Millionaire" and "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" were excellent films, and plan on seeing those soon. What's great about the movie theaters close to campus (Oriental Theater, Downer Theater) is that they feature a lot of these Oscar nominees. Its great that UWM students have access to these films at a reasonable price in great old theatres. This Sunday will be exciting to see who steals the show and captures the ultimate prize- an Oscar!

Poet Paradise

For all you poets out there, I’d like to point out an interesting website cleverly named poetry.com. It hosts daily, monthly, and annual poetry contests along with miscellaneous things like poetry IQ quizzes and my favorite, the rhyming dictionary. I used to be obsessed with this website back in high school and mainly used it for a nice place to compile my poetry without fear of ever losing it to a house fire or computer meltdown, but once they started harassing my mailbox with announcements that I won The Best Poet Award—I’ve won around twenty times for each poem—the annoyance outweighed the convenience. The website still has its perks, however, and I visit the rhyming dictionary and browse through the millions of poems for a laugh. I will never be a professional poet, and I’m far from bubbling over with talent, but let me explain:

“Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious” by Jane Doe

Welcome to the space jam my friend
stay awhile, meet Michael Jordan
for you see, I am not like them
not like them at all
i need space, intellectualism
time most of all
cuz i love you
and that's all there is to it
i need you in my life, in my time
so come to me and do yo thang!
baby!
Baby!
BABY!
BBAABBYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ttyl babe, gtg

love y'all

Love it!

The Dead Are Not Dead!

http://www.jambase.com/ has recently released tour dates for the Grateful Dead's 09' tour! They will begin their tour in North Carolina, and end in good ol' California. Along the way they are scheduled to play in Chicago on cinco de mayo (5/5) at the All State Arena at 7:30p. This will be a summer to remember, with Phish and The Grateful Dead doing reunion tours in the same year. It will most likely be the last year we will have the opportunity to see either of these bands! Tickets go on sale to the public tomorrow morning at 10am! Get your fingers ready, and dont miss out on the most epic concert of the summer!!

Confessions of a Shopaholic

I am going to make the assumption that I will hate this movie, and thought it would be a good topic to write about. So I thought I'd wait until it comes out, watch it, then give a really good review of it and have backup for my reasons for bashing it. But then I realized I'd have to pay money to see it and that is something I'll never do. My biggest concern with this is its promotion of consumption in America. I'm basing a lot of my opinion off of info. I got from my JMC 214 class, Advertising in American Society.We are in a culture that is either going to help save the world or destroy it. Americans are living an insane life that just keeps using and wasting. It's a big deal that hasn't yet hit us yet. What I'm trying to say is that there is a bigger issue at hand, than just marketing for Prada or whatever hand bags will be featured in the film (or google, which has even been product-placed into the advertisements on television). This movie is going to promote wasteful spending, just like 101 Dalmatians promoted puppy mills filled with dalmatians. Is it cool and cute to not have control over what you purchase? Is this entertainment? Is this even funny?I think I'm trying to tackle something that everyone knows about but doesn't really do anything about. Sweat shops are everywhere, even in the United States (look up Northern Mariana Islands), and know that people are dying, have hardly any money to eat, have no health insurance, sometimes no freedom, and make next to nothing so that Americans can have their clothing. If it's not made in America, it's almost guaranteed that it wasn't so it could be made by cheaper labor. I think it's important to know where your money is going when you buy things.

It's Game Time...

Perhaps need a new site to look at when you‘re surfing the web.. Maybe, you need another way to pass time while you’re on your laptop in class (Not that I’m endorsing doing anything else besides note taking…c‘mon now my professor is probably reading this.) A friend of mine recently introduced me to a fantastic website called AddictingGames.com. As you probably figured by the title, it is a website composed of different games.



This is a free website with hundreds of different games to choose from in just about every genre. Granted there’s a few clunkers on the site, it’s more than likely you will find a game or two that you do find truly addicting. My personal favorite on the site is the Helicopter Game, which the object is simply to guide your helicopter along a side-scrolling screen without hitting the halls. Like I said before, if you are looking to pass some extra time next time you’re on the computer, check it out.

Annoying Advertising

Lately, every time I am sitting down relaxing in front of the television, I see several commercials about the upcoming movie, Fired Up. The movie is going be released February 20 of this year. It is about two high school football players that are dreading football summer camp. The two come up with an idea to join the cheerleading squad, and find themselves at cheer camp instead. They originally go to meet new beautiful women, but one of the guys falls head over heels in love.

Like we didn't see that coming. It seems like many movies that involve teenagers lives nowadays, are so predictable.

Usually I appreciate many forms of advertising, and can see why companies do what they do. But these particular commercials are so repetitive. They show the same scenes no matter which trailer is shown. It seems like it doesn't matter which channel I am watching, I still see the commercial every break in the show.

I know, I know, the company would be happy with me writing online about this upcoming movie, and happy to know these commercials stuck in my head, but after seeing it over and OVER, I have no intention of seeing it in the theaters or renting.

I'm not angry about these ads, I just feel like I've already seen it, so why waste my time...

Coraline- For an older crowd...

On Sunday, I went with my mom, aunt, and cousin to see the new Tim Burton 3-D movie Coraline, and overall, I'd say it was a pretty good movie.

The movie is based on the book Coraline written by Neil Gaiman. It's a story about a young girl who moves with her parents into a big house called The Pink Palace with strange neighbors. After moving in, her parents are so busy that she has to find ways to entertain herself. She ends up meeting a boy called Wybie and his black cat. After meeting him, he gives her a doll that looks exactly like her. After she falls asleep that night, she is awakened by mice who lead her to a door in the wall. After she opens and goes through the door, she is taken into a world just like hers, only with parents who pay attention to her and neighbors who aren't crazy. Although it seems great at first, the other world turns out to be a nightmare, with her "other" mother trying to capture her and make her stay there forever.

Although I thought the movie was really good, I definitely thought it was geared more towards young adults. The movie is rated PG, but I think it should really be rated PG-13. The movie is quite hard to understand, having some depth and requiring you to think a little bit. I also thought some parts were a little too provocative for young kids. Besides the scarier images and some adult language, there's this one scene where Coraline's elderly neighbor appears wearing a g-string and pasties. Pasties on a 72-year old cartoon with size double-G breasts? Really?I was actually pretty shocked, and even saw some parents covering their children's eyes. I mean, the scene was completely inappropriate, not to mention it added nothing to the scene and had no relevance in the movie whatsoever.

Like I said, I thought the movie was really good and it definitely sparked my attention, but I would think twice before taking children under the age of 12 to it. And I'm certainly glad I saw the 2-D version, because I don't how I would have dealt with those pasties in 3-D. EW.

What happened to all the Talk Shows???

So, every since I could remember I was surrounded by Television talk shows. From Sally, Ricki Lake, to Jenny Jones. Now, it seems as though reality television has replaced them like VH1'sn reality television shows such as For the love of Ray J, I love money and Rock of love tour bus. Although theses two different genres have soo much in common, talk shows has somehow become depopularized by reality TV. These two are similar in such ways like, broadcasting citizens real life situations for the world to see. Like cheating lovers, paternity tests and secret love affairs. On reality television shows such as Real World many of those factors mentioned above apply to many of the roommates life styles. They also target the same audiences. Watching talk shows as those mentioned above were highly entertaining and kept viewers tuned in. Some differences include the style in how they expose the realities. To a certain extent talk shows seem more believable because in most cases its taped live in front of a live audience. So to answer the question of What happened to all the talk shows???? Times have changed and some genres have homogenized into a super genre so to speak. So reality television is simply the talk shows of the future.

NBA on TNT

I had some time to watch a bit of my favorite sport on television last night--basketball. While I don't get the chance to do this often enough, I still decided to punish myself and view the halftime show from a journalistic perspective for this class. Chris Webber and Kenny Smith, two former players themselves, need some work. While Smith is entertaining and can be serious, he is egged on by Webber, who contributes nothing to the broadcast. I couldn't understand much of what he was saying at all, and he followed everything he said with a cackle of nervous laughter.

Where is Charles Barkley when you need him? He and Smith worked well together and mixed humor and analysis to keep the viewer entertained and informed. The answer is that Barkley had quite the issue with a DUI arrest, and is nearing the end of a suspension from TNT for doing so. Without him, the program suffered. Smith spent an entire segment trying to make a trick shot while Webber and the host, Ernie Johnson, talked over him. Sigh. Say what you want about Barkley, but I would have been interested in what he had to say and do, unlike Webber.

On the bright side, the game itself was entertaining and good, but if TNT wants me to watch the halftime show in the future, they need to hire a babysitter for Barkley so he isn't cut out of the show anymore.

The Grammy's

I'm not sure how many of you were able to watch the three and a half hour Grammy's on Sunday night, but for those who did saw an interesting mix of performances. This years Grammy's were all about collaborations and different artists coming together. For instance Justin Timberlake and Al Green, Coldplay and Jay-Z. But the performance that stands alone is m.i.a's swagger like us featuring T.I, Jay-Z, Lil wayne, and Kanye West. The weirdest performance has to go to Neil Diamond's performance of Sweet Caroline. For those of you who have not seen his performance it is basically a creepy old man doing a spoken word version of sweet Caroline because he can't sing it anymore. And finally where would we be without the DVR. The commercial breaks during the show seemed like they lasted forever and some of the performances were not worth watching. So luckily I was able to cut that three and half hours down to only and hour or so.

The Future of Print Journalism?

In last week's TIME Magazine comes this very interesting article. It is an essay by Walter Isaacson on what he believes the future of print journalism should do to adapt to the times of all newspapers and magazines being offered online, for free, as well as the traditional hard copy print manner.

Isaacson is the former Chairmen and CEO of CNN and also served as the Managing Editor of TIME. He is currently the President and CEO of the Aspen Institute, which is a nonpartisan educational and policy studies organization based in Washington D.C.

Isaacson believes that certain newspapers and magazines should start charging for their content by different sorts of micropayments by the user. He says the best way to make these micropayments successful would to have an E-ZPass way of payment. E-ZPass as in the way commuters in the New York State area pay for tolls on the highway system (Or I-Pass in the Illinois area). Each time someone passes through a certain point then their prepaid account automatically gets charged.

It is very intriguing idea. I don't believe that this system would work on the web right at this moment. But regardless, something does need to be done to help save print journalism from falling ad revenue and lower subscription rates for some of today's newspapers and magazines.

Pepsi Logo Design Document a Hoax?

The other day, a friend working in the web design business sent me an email telling me to check out the strange PDF that "explains" the new Pepsi logo.

This PDF is supposed to be the designer's pitch to the makers of Pepsi. What is getting peoples attention is just how ridiculous the in-depth pitch is.



The document is a 27 page PDF that compares the new pepsi logo to such things as various emoticons and the Mona Lisa. It breaks down the past pepsi designs into tons of tiny circles and relates them to the new logo. It even explains the Pepsi planet, solar system, and universe.

Now, I've seen design pitches before that are similarly thorough, but this struck me as contrived from the first time I looked at it. I started thinking, this is just too silly. Aside from being ridiculous, it doesn't really explain anything about the design decisions and the desired affect on people receiving the product.

As it turns out, other bloggers and journalists are feeling the same way. What was once thought to be a "leaked" design pitch is now being called viral marketing campaign.

As a person with an interest in advertising, my first reaction was that if it is a marketing campaign, their marketing people are awesome. They're marketing a PDF that takes a jab at marketing. Even better, they're delivering it directly the digitial generation, most of whom believe they are above the reach of formal advertising. What's more, the people distributing the document believe they're "in" on pointing out the obsurdity of the behind the scenes of advertising. In the end though, the jokes on them. They're doing exactly what Pepsi wants. It's brilliant. It's like the mouse outsmarted the cat, and now the cat's back for revenge.

The document hasn't been denied or confirmed to be fake as of yet. There's always the case that it actually isn't fake. If that's the case, I just thought way too into it!

Joaquin Phoenix???????

Last night I was watching David Letterman and Joaquin Phoenix was on the show. I generally love him so I was excited that he was on, but it sure wasn't the Joaquin Phoenix that I thought it was going to be. Throughout the entire show he pretty much just sat there and twiddled his thumbs sipping his water sporadically and not saying much of anything. After this went on for a little while David Letterman actually seemed to be a little confused and started making some jabs at him, I think more so because he didn't know what to do. The man would not answer any of his questions. He was wearing these dark sunglasses the entire time so my assumption would be that he was under the influence of some sort because he was acting very strange.

I was so excited to write about this and show a clip of it on the blog today but when I went to YouTube to get the clip a message popped up that said, copyright claim by CBS Broadcasting Inc. Now I am not sure what this means exactly but it prohibited me from pulling up any real video from that interview. I did find, however, a short clip of the news and in it they show different parts of what took place in the interview with what had to be a, drugged up Joaquin.

Wrigley's is not "forever" loving Chris Brown anymore

In the entertainment industry it is nothing new about watching seemingly smart, and very rich people do extremely dumb things. It has almost even become expected of them, sort of a right of passage to stardom. However there are those few instances where we watch "America's Sweethearts" with squeaky clean, cookie cutter images get involved in bad situations where it leaves us feeling so dumbfound because we never saw it coming. This is definitely so for a lot of fans of R&b/Pop phenoms Chris Brown and Rihanna and the allegations circulating them. TMZ.com first broke the news Sunday, the night of the Grammys, after the seemingly perfect couple canceled their performances at the start studded event. Later it was released that Chris Brown had turned himself in to LA police after a 911 call came in from a female who said she had been attacked by Brown. It didn't take long for news sites, blogs, and radio stations to begin speculating Rihanna as the alleged victim. Brown, who posted his $50,000 bail and was released, has now lost his endorsement deal with Wrigley's gum as a result. I personally agree with the decision of the company to disassociate its brand from the singer with the severity of the allegations.

I'm in ur internets, writing ur blogz.

Lolcats. You either love their cuteness or hate their stupidity. I knew it was a little pop culture phenomenon cooking on the internet, but I didn’t realize how much of a phenomenon it had become until I was browsing Barnes and Noble this weekend and actually found a compiled book of Lolcats. For those of you who are deprived of Lolcats, or are lucky enough to have never heard of them—however you want to put it—let me explain to you their simple humor. Take a picture of an animal, it doesn’t even have to be a cat, sea manatees work if you wish, add a clever caption stated in poor grammar, and pow! You’ve just created your first Lolcat. I won’t deny that I hated Lolcats in the beginning. I thought they were pointless and dumb. But when one of my guy friends openly laughed and pushed Lolcats in my face, I began to cave. Simply the fact that a macho football player was browsing through endless pictures of kittens with tears in his eyes from laughing so hard started to make the amusement contagious. Sometimes it’s hard to find a funny one, but when a Lolcat is exceptionally clever or there’s an exceptionally cute animal, the giggles hit you hard. I’ve come to realize they’re sort of like Haikus; they’re quick, dull, seemingly empty shells of entertainment, but when you ponder them for a second and let the flavor sink in, there’s really something there.

I Feel Funny

I find the recent phenomena of a little boy named David to be quite hilarious. I am absolutely amazed by how much attention a child can get so many media attention for being high on laughing gas. The first video of this was posted by the dad on January 30th. A few of the same video by different people have also been posted. These few videos have already gotten more than two million views. He has also been on shows like "Best Week Ever" and "The Soup". I find the video absolutely hilarious and I'm glad it was on "Best Week Ever" because that is where I first saw it.

YouTube's broadcast yourself theory has countless occurrences of people putting their face on the Internet and doing something outrageous or funny, and for doing that millions of viewers could identify them.

Not only has David's laughing gas hit counted up a ton of views, but a second video of him telling a joke has as well. Now this joke and video are rather humorless, and they are not entertaining, but it is amazing how much attention it has gotten just because it is the same kid who was tweaking in his dad's backseat.

You can tell me how funny you think this is...

Gold Medal or Acapulco Gold?

Olympic gold medal winner, Michael Phelps is under investigation for smoking pot on the University of South Carolina Campus. A picture was taken at a party while Phelps was smoking marijuana out of a bong. The photo was then published in a tabloid. Phelps admitted to the authorities is was indeed him smoking in the photo.





"I engaged in behavior which was regrettable and demonstrated bad judgement. I'm 23 years old and despite the successes I've had in the pool, I acted in a youthful and inappropriate way, not in a manner people have come to expect from me. For this, I am sorry. I promise my fans and the public it will not happen again," said Phelps in an interview with WIS NEWS 10.





Phelps as well as eight others are under investigation for drug possession and distribution.





I feel this story was blown way out of proportion. I understand Phelps signed a contract that did not allow illegal use of narcotics; but the fact that he is a Olympic gold medalist is why this particular photo was frowned upon by many. He is still able to obtain great accomplishments in the water, and the fact that he is facing conviction due to a picture is absurd. It is not illegal to smoke pot, however it is illegal to possess it. By him admitting to smoking does not justify the right to punish him with drug possession. It could have been tobacco in the bong, who knows, but by him admitting it is where it gets fuzzy.

Also, why are authorities wasting taxpayers dollars for such a petty action? When cigarettes kill more poeple in ONE day than marijuana does in a lifetime!

An A-Bomb drops on VH1

So there's yet another dating show that's entered into the mix, and it is definitely an interesting one at that. Airing on VH1,"For the Love of Ray J" follows Ray J, a "famous" actor and rapper as he sets out to find true love. Just like Rock of Love, Flavor of Love, I Love New York...the list goes on- it's really about some has-been celebrity trying to rejuvenate his career while a bunch of nasty, attention starved groupies compete for the limelight and television time.

Don't get me wrong...these shows have certainly served to be my guilty pleasures, but it's starting to get annoying how they all pretend to be about love when all it's about is camera time. I mean, these girls are given fake names like Atomic Bomb, Hot Cocoa, and Caviar. Is the audience really supposed to believe that some C-List celebrity is going to find true love with someone he names after fish eggs? And the challenges he has these girls do to prove his love? Pathetic. In the second episode, he has these girls get on a web cam, pretending he's on the road, and he makes them entertain him with some hidden talent. But hidden talents to these girls include everything from beer-bonging to creating a human banana split.

Although I love these shows, I think it would be more entertaining to see someone who is a current, popular celebrity really try to find love with someone not named after liquor or food products. And if not, I just ask that I never have to see someone admit to downing a beer from a funnel as their "talent."

When DUI's make frontpage news then there might just be a content problem

When looking at the JSONLINE frontpage, I noticed that one of the main stories is that Darnell Cole received a DUI and it was definately one of the top headlines for the day. I wonder if this is really that necessary? I'm not saying that a DUI isn't a big deal, and I know that it is indeed public information. But, I would think that there are other newsworthy topics worth writing a headline story about than this.

For those who don't know, Darnell Cole is the President of MATC. I feel as if posting this story is just an attack on an everyday guy. Just because he holds a major position with MATC, does that mean he should be in the spotlight for being arrested on an offense that happens frequently to thousands of people daily? It almost seems like they would post this as an embarassement to him. I could MAYBE see it being under a smaller colomn or in public records, but I definately don't consider this newsworthy of a main headline.

I guess I am posting my blog on this because I feel as if the public shouldn't have to be informed of information like this. If he had done something that directly affected his position as President of MATC, if he had hurtsomeone during the incident, or commited another outstanding crime, then maybe it should be posted. However, it was a simple DUI arrest that doesn't change the lives of anyone who reads it, and nobody was affected by the situation except for him.

http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/39340012.html

The Real World...Staged?

Many of us tune into the Real World Brooklyn on Wednesdays at 10 p.m. As many of us believe, this popular reality show is real life shown about 8 very different people. They have their lives tapped 24/7 with no scripts, just themselves for the public to see. But are they really being real? With a camera around you, wouldn't you change your personality somewhat, knowing that every move you make will be aired on television?
I have actually met a couple people who have been on the show and they say, it's not completely "real."
This past episode that was on last week, questioned a lot of things for me. Chet, one of they guys living in the house, wants to be the next Carson Daly. He wants to be a host for MTV's non-existing show, TRL. He goes to get tickets to this show at MTV's head-quarters, to find out the bad news. It's weird to me that a camera crew, that works for MTV, is following him around obviously knowing that this show no longer exists. Why didn't they just tell him. Or did they, and just wanted him to continue on, to get the video footage.



Supposedly, the crew members are not allowed to talk to the roomates living in the house. Maybe Chet really didn't know that TRL was off the air. It just seems weird that he didn't know anything about this, especially because it was his life long goal.

I couldn't find just a clip of the show I'm talking about so here is the full episode. The clip starts at 19:25 and ends at 20:02 (the third triangle)

Real World: Brooklyn - MTV Shows

Cheater Cheater

Use of steroids is a hot topic in today's sports world. They have become even more media tasty since the whole Rafael Palmeiro saying "Let me start by telling you this: I have never used steroids, period. I don't know how to say it any more clearly than that. Never."pointing his finger at a Congressional hearing in 2005. There was rampant and detailed use in the NFL during the 80's, "professional" wrestling in the Vince McMahon era, and now baseball.

Barry Bonds is the poster child of steroid use in MLB. Books have been written alleging the use, and he of course has denied ever taking anything. Roger Clemens has been accused and the evidence is very damning. But those players are..well old. They are not the face of MLB.

Enter Alex Rodriguez.

He is the face of the younger generation of baseball superstars. When the use of steroids started to come out in Major League Baseball he denied ever using. This is an interview he gave to Katie Couric on 60 minutes.



Now the truth has come out. He did use steroids. Not once like Andy Pettitte, but for three years. "When I arrived in Texas in 2001, I felt an enormous amount of pressure, felt all the weight of the world on top of me to perform, and perform at a high level every day," Rodriguez told ESPN's Peter Gammons in an interview 48 hours after the report came out that he tested positive in 2003.

Should all of his numbers be wiped from his stats and MLB records? Maybe an asterisk next to his final career numbers? This is a slap in the face of every player that has earned his stats by hard work, not liquid in a needle. Since steroid use was not against the "rules" when he took them he can't be punished now. But in a sense he will be punished for the rest of his life by being branded a cheater.

I have never agreed with athletes being role models and this is why.

An extended interview will air tonight on SportsCenter at 6 p.m. ET.